진로지도 및 진로상담의 이론과 실제

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
1. 문제의 제기
2. 용어의 정의
3. 연구의 제한점

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
1. 진로결정수준과 진로준비행동
2. 진로결정수준과 진로준비행동의 발달
3. 진로결정수준과 진로준비행동의 측정
4. 진로결정수준 및 진로준비행동과 관련된 변인들
5. 진로결정수준의 차원과 유형: 선행연구의 개관

Ⅲ. 연구문제
1. 문제의 구체화
2. 연구문제

Ⅳ. 연구방법
1. 연구대상
2. 연구도구
3. 연구절차
4. 자료분석

Ⅴ. 결과 및 해석
1. 진로결정수준과 진로준비행동의 발달 및 상호관계
2. 검사지와 면담에 의한 진로준비행동 측정결과의 일치성
3. 진로결정수준과 진로준비행동을 준거로 한 유형화
4. 학년별 타입분포의 변화
5. 유형화된 각 타입별 특성
6. 사범대학생의 진로결정수준 및 진로준비행동의 특성
Ⅵ. 논 의

Ⅶ. 결론 및 제언
1. 결 론
2. 시사점
3. 제 언

본문내용

6(15.7%), B type: 29(9.9%), C type: 95(32.4%), D type: 123(42.9%)>.
(4) There is significant change in composition ratio of types according to go up into a higher class. There are many A types in higher class, but many D types in lower class.
(5) Each subtypes have a unique characteristics. The contents are as follows.
types
career
decision
career
behavior
career
maturity
career
identity
decision making styles
trait
anxiety
rat.
int.
dep.
A type
B type
C type
D type
62.33
60.45
47.35
45.02
40.65
27.41
39.12
25.34
152.63
147.45
134.95
131.15
56.67
54.10
45.82 42.35
30.54
28.34
28.79
26.99
22.98
23.86
24.76
24.48
20.52
23.69
23.98
24.05
42.63
46.90
50.19
50.71
means
50.02
32.42
137.37
46.89
28.27
24.27
23.44
48.89
(6) The result of qualitative analysis of interview contents are as follows. First, chacteristics in career decision of the teacher's college students are ①enterance of teacher's college with the summons for teacher, ②high level of satisfaction on their choice of college and major, ③high level of career decision and supportive concerns of significant others, ④high level of anxiety on achievement of career goals. Second, chacteristics in career behavior of the teacher's college students are summarized as ①main partners for the conversation about their career are parent and friends, ②lack of efforts for self-identification, ③positive efforts for understanding on "world of work", ④following the patternized courses in career behavior.
Ⅳ. Discussion
The present study shows that career decision level and career preparation behavior have developmental properties and that college students can be devided into four groups according to their career decision level and career preparation behavior. This finding can assist the practitioner in addressing the subtle and unique needs of individule clients. That is, career counselors have to consider an individual's career preparation behavior, career identity, anxiety level and decision making style as important factors in the counseling practice. And it is useful to include both undecided and decided individuals in a typology. For example, most individuals in this study were members of a group that is rarely discussed in the vocational and counseling literature, that is, B(pseudo) and C(behavioral) type individuals.
Despite of some limitations, this study provides rather strong empirical data against the uniformity myth for career indecision, which has clear implications for researchers and practitioners. And we suggest a need to replicate, but especially refine, the results by means of utilizing more clearly definded samples and variables that better differentiate. Extensive assessment across more specific populations and broad areas of functioning should allow the development of appropriate and individualized treatment plans.
Key words: career guidance and career counseling, career decision level, career preparation behavior, teacher's college students, diagnostic typology, cognition and behavior

키워드

진로지도,   진로상담,   진로준비행동,   유형화된 각 타입별 특성,   사범대학생,   학년별 타입분포의 변화