복지국가의 유형에 관한 질적 비교분석

목차

1. 머리말

2. 비교분석의 방법
1) 비교분석의 두가지 전략
2) 두 전략의 결합 : 질적 비교분석

3. 복지국가의 다양성과 그 원천
1) 복지국가의 다양성
2) 복지국가 다양성의 원천
3) 질적 비교분석에 활용된 원인변수들과 그 출처

4. 분석결과와 토론

5. 요약 및 토론

참 고 문 헌

본문내용

1985. "Age Structure, Politics, and Cross-National Patterns of Public Pension Expenditures." American Sociological Review (50).
Ragin, C. 1994. "A qualitative Comparative Analysis of Pension Systems." in The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. edited by T. Janoski & A. Hicks. Cambridge University Press.
Rose, R. 1989. "Welfare : The Public/Private Mix." in Privatization and Welfare State. edited by S. Kamerman & A. Kahn. Princeton University Press.
Stephens, J. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. Macmillan.
Streeck, W. & P. Schmitter. 1985. "Community, Market, State and Associations? The Progressive Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order." in Private Interest Government : Beyond Market and the State. edited by W. Streeck & P. Schmitter. Sage.
Thelen, K. & S. Steinmo. 1992. "Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics." in Structuring Politics. edited by S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth. Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, G. et al. 1991. Markets, Hierarchies & Network : The Coordination of Social Life, Sage Publications.
M. Weir, A. Orloff, & T. Skocpol. 1988. The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton University Press.
Wilensky, H. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality. University of California Press.
. 1981. "Leftism, Catholicism, and Democratic Corporatism : The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development." in The Development of Welfare State in Europe and America. edited by P. Flora & A. Heidenheimer. Transaction Books.
A qualitative Comparative Analysis of Welfare Regimes Interventionist, Liberalist, and Confucian Welfare State
Hong, Kyung-Zoon
(Chonbuk Univ. Social Welfare)
The purpose of this study is to classify welfare regimes using the method of qualitative comparative analysis(QCA). By formalizing the logic of qualitative analysis, QCA makes it possible to bring the logic and empirical intensity of qualitative approaches to studies that normally call for the use of quantitative methods. In QCA each case is conceived holistically, as a configuration of conditions, not a collection of scores on variables.
Major findings of this study are as follows. Firstly, major explanations for welfare state differences are partly supported. Indicators relevant to each explanation can appear to be important only if other causal conditions are considered. For example, in the interventionist welfare states, high GDP per capita must be combined with the weakness of the Right and ethnic homogeneity. Otherwise, it can't discern interventionist from liberalist welfare states. Secondly, the equation for the interventionist welfare states includes multiple causal conjunctures. Many studies of welfare state find the same results. The third main finding is that IDV(individualism index) which is proxy for the weakness of informal network matters. Combining with other variables, IDV seems to be important in explaining the emergence of Confucian welfare states.

키워드

복지국가,   자유주의,   유교주의,   원인변수,   비교분석,   변수중심전략