• ํ†ตํ•ฉ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
  • ๋Œ€ํ•™๋ ˆํฌํŠธ
  • ๋…ผ๋ฌธ
  • ๊ธฐ์—…์‹ ์šฉ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ
  • ์ทจ์—…์ž๋ฃŒ
  • ํŒŒ์›Œํฌ์ธํŠธ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ
  • ์„œ์‹

์ „๋ฌธ์ง€์‹ 190๊ฑด

metaphor๋ฅผ simile๋กœ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋ฉด์„œ ๊ทธ ๋Œ€์ƒ์„ ๋ช…์‹œ๋ฅผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์•”์ฝ”์–‘์ด์˜ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์™€ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์ด ์›๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์—ญ์‹œ, processing effort๋ฅผ ์ค„์—ฌ์ฃผ๋ฉด์„œ ์›๋ฌธ์˜ contextual effect๋ฅผ ์–ด๋Š ์ •๋„ ๋ณด์กดํ•ด ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์›๋ฌธ์— ์ƒ์‘ํ•˜๋Š”
  • ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ 22ํŽ˜์ด์ง€
  • ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 2,800์›
  • ๋“ฑ๋ก์ผ 2007.03.17
  • ํŒŒ์ผ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ํ•œ๊ธ€(hwp)
  • ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์žˆ์Œ
  • ์ตœ๊ทผ 2์ฃผ ํŒ๋งค ์ด๋ ฅ ์—†์Œ
The first thing that I want to analysis in those three poems is that words are more important than ideas. Each poem uses words as a metaphor which is major role to consist a poem compared with ideas that do not give a strong impression to readers. Firstly, I am going to talk about Sylvia Plathโ€™s โ€œ
  • ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ 4ํŽ˜์ด์ง€
  • ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 1,300์›
  • ๋“ฑ๋ก์ผ 2011.06.18
  • ํŒŒ์ผ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ์›Œ๋“œ(doc)
  • ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์—†์Œ
  • ์ตœ๊ทผ 2์ฃผ ํŒ๋งค ์ด๋ ฅ ์—†์Œ
in the line โ€œO red fruit, ivory, fine timbers!โ€ This poem is too difficult for me to understand. 
  • ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ 1ํŽ˜์ด์ง€
  • ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 1,000์›
  • ๋“ฑ๋ก์ผ 2010.01.28
  • ํŒŒ์ผ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ํ•œ๊ธ€(hwp)
  • ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์—†์Œ
  • ์ตœ๊ทผ 2์ฃผ ํŒ๋งค ์ด๋ ฅ ์—†์Œ
๋ฃจ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์•„๋‹๊นŒ? ์„œ๋กœ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์š•๋ง์˜ ๋ ๊ฐ€ ์ถค์„ ์ถ”๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐœ์ธ์ , ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์ธ์ƒ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹๊นŒ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•ด ๋ณธ๋‹ค. - Work Cited - ๊ถŒํƒ์˜ ์—ฎ์Œ. ใ€Ž์žํฌ๋ผ๊นก์˜ ์š•๋ง์ด๋ก ใ€(๋ฌธ์˜ˆ์ถœํŒ์‚ฌ: 2000.5.), 11. ๊น€์ƒ์ค€. ใ€Žํ”„๋กœ์ดํŠธ์™€ ์˜ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณธ๋‹ค
  • ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ 12ํŽ˜์ด์ง€
  • ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 2,000์›
  • ๋“ฑ๋ก์ผ 2011.08.02
  • ํŒŒ์ผ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ํ•œ๊ธ€(hwp)
  • ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์žˆ์Œ
  • ์ตœ๊ทผ 2์ฃผ ํŒ๋งค ์ด๋ ฅ ์—†์Œ
์˜ค์„ธํ•„ ๊ฐ•์ •์•  ์—ญ, ์‹œ๊ณต์‚ฌ, 1998 -์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ํ—ค๋Ÿด๋“œ๊ฒฝ์ œ ๋ฐ•ํ‰์‹์˜ ์˜ํ™”์ฝ๊ธฐ(๋ฒ ๋ฅดํžˆ๋งŒ๊ณผ ๋– ๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ณ ๋…์—ฌํ–‰) http://www.heraldbiz.com/site/data/html_dir/2004/07/09/200407090015.asp, 2004๋…„ 7์›” 9์ผ 1. ์€์œ (metaphor) 2. ์›Œ์‹œ์•„์›ƒ(washout) <<์€์œ (metaphor) ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ>>
  • ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ 3ํŽ˜์ด์ง€
  • ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 1,800์›
  • ๋“ฑ๋ก์ผ 2012.04.20
  • ํŒŒ์ผ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ํ•œ๊ธ€(hwp)
  • ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์žˆ์Œ
  • ์ตœ๊ทผ 2์ฃผ ํŒ๋งค ์ด๋ ฅ ์—†์Œ

๋…ผ๋ฌธ 1๊ฑด

Metaphorical theology: Models of god in religious languageใ€). ์ •์• ์„ฑ ์—ญ. ์„œ์šธ: ๋‹ค์‚ฐ๊ธ€๋ฐฉ. Miller. J. P.(2001). ํ™€๋ฆฌ์Šคํ‹ฑ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •(ใ€ŽThe Holistic curriculumใ€). ๊น€ํ˜„์žฌ ์™ธ ์—ญ. ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ: ์ฑ…์‚ฌ๋ž‘. Norberg-Hodge. Helena(1992). ์˜ค๋ž˜๋œ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜: ๋ผ๋‹คํฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฐฐ์šด๋‹ค(ใ€ŽAncient futures: Lear
  • ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ 28ํŽ˜์ด์ง€
  • ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 3,600์›
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰์ผ 2008.10.27
  • ํŒŒ์ผ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ํ•œ๊ธ€(hwp)
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰๊ธฐ๊ด€
  • ์ €์ž
top