목차
Ⅰ. 시작하는 말
Ⅱ. 근원적 존재로서의 도
Ⅲ. 존재와 인식의 상관관계
Ⅳ. 존재 인식의 두 길 : 분별지와 명지
Ⅴ. 끝맺는 말
참 고 문 헌
Abstract
Ⅱ. 근원적 존재로서의 도
Ⅲ. 존재와 인식의 상관관계
Ⅳ. 존재 인식의 두 길 : 분별지와 명지
Ⅴ. 끝맺는 말
참 고 문 헌
Abstract
본문내용
, 臺北 1981.
, 『老子註譯及評介』, 中華書局, 香港 1987.
焦 , 『老子翼』, 新文 出版公司, 臺北 1983.
馮友蘭, 『中國哲學史』(上), 三聯書店有限公司, 香港 1992.
黃登山, 『老子釋義』, 學生書局, 臺北 1987.
侯外廬 主編, 『中國思想通史』(1), 人民出版社, 北京 1980.
關鋒·林聿時, 「論老子哲學體系的唯心主義本質」, 『老子哲學討論集』, 中華書局, 北京 1959.
金恒培, 「老子의 道와 德에 관한 硏究」, 東國大 博士學位論文, 1983.
, 「老莊思想에 있어서 道의 辨證論理와 認識論理의 統一」, 『哲學硏究』, 제19집, 哲學硏究會, 1984.
宋恒龍, 「道家的 立場에서 본 東洋的 思惟構造의 特質」, 『中國文學報』, 제2호, 壇國大 中國語中國文學科, 1975.
申東浩, 「老子思想의 存在論的 檢討」, 『人文科學論文集』, 제8권 2호, 忠南大 人文科學硏究所, 1980.
安晋吾, 「老子의 道와 그 論理的 性格」, 『龍鳳論叢』, 제4집, 全南大 人文科學硏究所, 1975.
- 64 -
柳仁熙, 「老·莊의 本體論」, 『東洋哲學의 本體論과 人性論』, 延世大學校出版部, 서울 1986.
李揆相, 「老子哲學에 있어서의 「自然」의 問題」, 忠南大 碩士學位論文, 1986.
, 「老子의 否定的 思惟方法에 대한 摸索」, 『東西哲學硏究』, 제11호, 韓國東西哲學硏究會, 1994.
李在權, 「老子哲學에 있어서의 「無」의 問題」, 忠南大 碩士學位論文, 1983.
Abstract
The Correlation of Being and Cognition in the Lao Tzu Philosophy
- 65 -
- Lee, Jong Sung -
Tao, the central conception of the Lao Tzu Philosophy, is the origin of being. It is the fundamental being composing the world, the energy creating the universe, the law moving and changing things, and the standard of human behavior. Seen in existential aspect, tao transcends time and space. Meanwhile, it is self-existent. In other words, tao is the fundamental being preceding any morphological distinction or predication.
As a result, Lao Tzu attempts to recognize being which is not being with cognition which is not cognition. Such an attempt makes the two beings of different dimension, the fundamental being and the signified being, indiscriminatively discussed. It also in the category of cognition leads to the indiscriminative discussion of distinctive knowledge and indistinctive knowledge.
The fundamental being in the Lao Tzu philosophy corresponds to indistinctive knowledge, and the signified being to distinctive knowledge. Therefore, for Lao Tzu, the cognition of being which is not being means recognizing the fundamental being, and the cognition which is not cognition refers to indistinctive knowledge. Correlating being with cognition, Lao Tzu points out the limitation of human sense and perception, criticizes the cognitive methodology that projects the antinomic mode of thinking, and paradoxically suggests a method of penetrating tao as a pure being or a pure figure.
Lao Tzu believes that tao can be mastered by indistinctive knowledge which has conscious orientation excluded. As a result, he denies distinctive knowledge which recognizes the world through conscious orientation. Being fundamentally gets in accord with cognition when we are free from the fixed belief in the substantiality of things, and when we are free from all the conceptual distinction and self-consciousness. It is at this moment that we come to experience truth transcending all the opposite as it is. And such a state can be attained through bright wisdom by which being and cognition become one and we get to discern tao, the world of absolute origin, from the world of phenomenon.
※ Key Words : Lao Tzu philosophy, tao, being, cognition, distinctive knowledge, bright wisdom
, 『老子註譯及評介』, 中華書局, 香港 1987.
焦 , 『老子翼』, 新文 出版公司, 臺北 1983.
馮友蘭, 『中國哲學史』(上), 三聯書店有限公司, 香港 1992.
黃登山, 『老子釋義』, 學生書局, 臺北 1987.
侯外廬 主編, 『中國思想通史』(1), 人民出版社, 北京 1980.
關鋒·林聿時, 「論老子哲學體系的唯心主義本質」, 『老子哲學討論集』, 中華書局, 北京 1959.
金恒培, 「老子의 道와 德에 관한 硏究」, 東國大 博士學位論文, 1983.
, 「老莊思想에 있어서 道의 辨證論理와 認識論理의 統一」, 『哲學硏究』, 제19집, 哲學硏究會, 1984.
宋恒龍, 「道家的 立場에서 본 東洋的 思惟構造의 特質」, 『中國文學報』, 제2호, 壇國大 中國語中國文學科, 1975.
申東浩, 「老子思想의 存在論的 檢討」, 『人文科學論文集』, 제8권 2호, 忠南大 人文科學硏究所, 1980.
安晋吾, 「老子의 道와 그 論理的 性格」, 『龍鳳論叢』, 제4집, 全南大 人文科學硏究所, 1975.
- 64 -
柳仁熙, 「老·莊의 本體論」, 『東洋哲學의 本體論과 人性論』, 延世大學校出版部, 서울 1986.
李揆相, 「老子哲學에 있어서의 「自然」의 問題」, 忠南大 碩士學位論文, 1986.
, 「老子의 否定的 思惟方法에 대한 摸索」, 『東西哲學硏究』, 제11호, 韓國東西哲學硏究會, 1994.
李在權, 「老子哲學에 있어서의 「無」의 問題」, 忠南大 碩士學位論文, 1983.
Abstract
The Correlation of Being and Cognition in the Lao Tzu Philosophy
- 65 -
- Lee, Jong Sung -
Tao, the central conception of the Lao Tzu Philosophy, is the origin of being. It is the fundamental being composing the world, the energy creating the universe, the law moving and changing things, and the standard of human behavior. Seen in existential aspect, tao transcends time and space. Meanwhile, it is self-existent. In other words, tao is the fundamental being preceding any morphological distinction or predication.
As a result, Lao Tzu attempts to recognize being which is not being with cognition which is not cognition. Such an attempt makes the two beings of different dimension, the fundamental being and the signified being, indiscriminatively discussed. It also in the category of cognition leads to the indiscriminative discussion of distinctive knowledge and indistinctive knowledge.
The fundamental being in the Lao Tzu philosophy corresponds to indistinctive knowledge, and the signified being to distinctive knowledge. Therefore, for Lao Tzu, the cognition of being which is not being means recognizing the fundamental being, and the cognition which is not cognition refers to indistinctive knowledge. Correlating being with cognition, Lao Tzu points out the limitation of human sense and perception, criticizes the cognitive methodology that projects the antinomic mode of thinking, and paradoxically suggests a method of penetrating tao as a pure being or a pure figure.
Lao Tzu believes that tao can be mastered by indistinctive knowledge which has conscious orientation excluded. As a result, he denies distinctive knowledge which recognizes the world through conscious orientation. Being fundamentally gets in accord with cognition when we are free from the fixed belief in the substantiality of things, and when we are free from all the conceptual distinction and self-consciousness. It is at this moment that we come to experience truth transcending all the opposite as it is. And such a state can be attained through bright wisdom by which being and cognition become one and we get to discern tao, the world of absolute origin, from the world of phenomenon.
※ Key Words : Lao Tzu philosophy, tao, being, cognition, distinctive knowledge, bright wisdom
추천자료
[교육철학자][교육사상가]그리스 교육철학자(교육사상가) 소피스트, 그리스 교육철학자(교육...
교육철학(교육사상) 도입과 발달, 교육철학(교육사상) 의의와 성격, 교육철학(교육사상) 분류...
유아교육철학자(교육사상) 플라톤과 키케로, 유아교육철학자(교육사상) 에라스무스와 루터, ...
교육철학(교육사상)의 기본개념, 교육철학(교육사상)의 역할, 진보주의 교육철학(교육사상), ...
[그리스철학, 희랍철학]그리스철학(희랍철학)과 자연철학, 그리스철학(희랍철학)과 이오니아...
[도덕철학, 흄, 칸트, 도덕성, 도덕종교, 칸트철학, 도덕, 공리주의]도덕철학과 흄, 도덕철학...
[철학사, 서양, 독일, 중국, 현대, 중국현대철학, 고전철학, 합리론, 경험론, 칸트 비판철학,...
[자연철학]자연철학과 후기다원론자, 자연철학과 자연철학자, 자연철학과 헤겔, 자연철학과 ...
[역사철학, 휠덜린, 벤야민, 아도르노, 칸트, 동서철학, 철학문화, 언어철학]휠덜린의 역사철...
[철학자, 피타고라스, 베이컨, 데카르트, 칸트, 하이데거, 비트겐슈타인, 야스퍼스]철학자 피...
[현대철학, 현대철학 전개, 실존철학, 생철학, 영미철학, 현상학]현대철학의 전개, 현대철학...
[불교철학, 불교철학과 연기법, 불교철학과 우주론, 불교철학과 힌두이즘, 불교철학과 사사무...
[스콜라철학, 스콜라주의, 스콜라신학, 스콜라사상, 스콜라, 철학, 신학, 사상]스콜라철학, ...
철학의 정의, 철학 방법, 철학 기본영역, 철학과 교육철학, 철학과 체육철학, 철학과 통치철...