의사소통능력향상을 위한 문법교육의 필요성

소개글

의사소통능력향상을 위한 문법교육의 필요성에 대한 보고서 자료입니다.

목차

국문요약 ⅰ
차례 ⅲ

제 1 장 서론 1
1.1 연구의 필요성 1
1.2 연구의 목적 3
1.3 연구방법 3

제 2 장 배경 이론 4
2.1 문법의 정의 4
2.1.1 문법 교육에 대한 부정적인 견해 4
2.1.2 문법 교육에 대한 긍정적인 견해 7
2.2 의사소통의 정의 10
2.2.1 Canale과 Swain의 의사소통 능력의 정의 10
2.2.2 Savignon의 의사소통 능력의 정의 11

제 3 장 의사소통 능력과 문법교육 13
3.1 의사소통 능력과 문법 능력의 관계 13
3.2 문법 교육의 최근 경향 14
3.2.1 형태초점 14
3.2.2 문법의식고양 15
3.3 문법 교육의 필요성 16
3.4 현재 우리나라 문법 교육의 문제점 17

제 4 장 초등영어에서 효과적인 문법 지도의 방향 21
4.1 의사소통적 교수법을 활용한 문법지도 효과에 대한 선행연구 21
4.2 문법 지도의 활용 23
4.2.1 문법 지도 방법 24
4.2.2 여러 가지 보조 자료 이용 26
4.3 의사소통적 교수법을 이용한 문법 지도 방안 29
4.3.1 게임(game)을 활용한 문법지도 30
4.3.2 역할극(role-play)을 활용한 문법 지도 31
4.4 의사소통적 교수법을 이용한 문법 지도 적용 33
4.4.1 게임(game)을 활용한 현재시제 지도의 예 ('-s') 33
4.4.2 역할극(role-play)을 활용한 미래 시제 지도 예 ('will')
37

제 5 장 결론 및 제언 41
참고문헌 43
영문요약 48

본문내용

York: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Feeman, D. (2001). Teaching grammar. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 251-266). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language methodology. In D. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Matheidesz, M. (1988). Communication games-Are they really effective? Paper presented at the Annuel Meeting of the International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, 22nd, Edinburgh, Scotland.
McKay, S. (1985). Teaching grammar: Form, function, and technique. New York: Pergamon Press.
McCallum, G. (1980). 101 Word games, New York: Oxford University Press.
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constrains on the teachability of language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186-214.
Rutherford, W. E. (1987). Second language grammar: Learning and teaching. New York: Longman.
Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading, Mass: Addison-Welsley.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
Strauber, S. K. (1982). Using alternate methods in EFL/ESL clauses. Paper presented at the Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Louisville, KY., April 22-24.
Thornbury, S. (2000). How to teach grammar. London: Longman.
Yoshida, N. J. (1985). Garme theory and research skills. Paper presented at the TRI-TESOL Conference, Bellevue, Washington, November 14-16.
Abstract
The Necessity of Teaching Grammar
in Elementary School English Education
for Communicative Competence
English Education
Graduate School of Education
Hongik University
Many linguists have argued that grammatical competence is a part of communicative competence, and that grammatical competence plays an important role in building a system of linguistic knowledge for the second language learners. For this reason, grammar instruction is essential for EFL students like Korean learners who have difficulties in speaking English.
Considering the fact that grammatical competence is a crucial part of communicative competence, grammar teaching needs to be properly performed in elementary school.
The purpose of this paper is to propose more effective method of teaching grammar in elementary school. This paper has suggested two teaching grammar activities. One is to play game (present tense: ‘-s’) suitable for 5th grade students and the provision of role playing (future tense: ‘will’) for 6th grade students.
The goal of this study is to show that grammar teaching improves communicative competence in English education for elementary school students.

키워드

문법교육,   문법교육의 중요성,   영어교육,   영어,   의사소통능력