연봉제의 도입과 효과에 관한 이론적 고찰
닫기
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
해당 자료는 10페이지 까지만 미리보기를 제공합니다.
10페이지 이후부터 다운로드 후 확인할 수 있습니다.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 연봉제의 정의

Ⅲ. 연봉제의 도입과 전략적 선택
Ⅲ.1 환경의 압력
Ⅲ.2 연봉제 도입의 촉진요인(Facilitators)과 제약 요인(Constraints)
Ⅲ.3 전략적 선택

Ⅳ. 연봉제 도입의 효과
Ⅳ.1 연봉제 도입여부와 도입전후에 따른 기업성과의 차이
Ⅳ.2 연봉제 도입 기업간의 성과차이
Ⅳ.3 연봉제 도입 기업의 개인 성과차이

Ⅴ. 맺음말

參 考 文 獻

**한글97

본문내용

.J. DiMaggio, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Fields. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Osterman, P. 1994. "How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?", Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 47, 173-188.
Pearce J. L. (1987), "Why Merit Pay Doesn't Work: Implications from Organizational Theory", in New Perspectives on Compensation, D. B. Balkin & L. R. Gomez-Mejia (Eds.), Prentice-Hall.
Pearce, J. L. & J. L. Perry (1983), Federal Merit Pay: "A Longitudinal Analysis", Public Administration Review 43, 315-325.
Pearce, J. L., W. B. Stevenson and J. L. Perry (1985), "Managerial Compensation Based on Organizational Performance: A Time-Series Analysis of the Impact of Merit Pay", Academy of Management Journal 28, 261-279.
Pfeffer, J., Salansik, G. R. (1978), The External Control of Organizations, New York, Harper & Row, Pub.
Porter M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, New York, Free Press.
Porter M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York, Free Press.
Rockmore B. W. & Scarpello V. Are the Determinants of Pay Plan Effectiveness the Same for American and Foreign Owned Business Units? (Georgia State University working paper, 1993).
Robbins S. P. (1998), Organizational Behavior, 8th (ed). Prentice Hall.
Rotter J. B. (1966), "Generalized Expectations of Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement", Psychological Monographs, Vol.1, No.609.
Schendel D. E. & Hofer C. W. (1979), Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning, Boston, Mass. Little Brown.
Scott, W.R. 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Thompson J. D. (1967), Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill.
Vroom V. H. (1964), Work and Motivation, John Wiley & Son, New York.
Winstanley, N. B. (1982), "Are Merit Increases Really Effective?" Personnel Administrator 4, 37-41.
Wright, P. & Mcmahan, G. C. (1992), Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management, Journal of Management, 18, 295-320.
Theoretical Review on Determinants and Performance Effects of Yeonbongje Pay Systems In Korea
Cyu-Chang Yu·Woo-Sung Park
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes empirically testable propositions regrading "Yeonbong-Je(merit pay systems in Korea)" which recently has been widely accepted in Korean Firms. From a relatively through literature review, we identified that the adoption of such pay system would be explained by technical pressures and institutional pressures. However, firms also would havve a room for strategic choice under the same environmental pressures. We identified that the "Yeonbong-Je" itself would not have much impact on firms' performance and individual performance. Rather, the performance effect of the pay system would be influenced by the congruence between the pay strategy and the firms' strategy, performance evaluation, and job and individual characteristics. Some related issues and practical implications are discussed in conclusion.

키워드

추천자료

  • 가격2,500
  • 페이지수34페이지
  • 등록일2002.11.02
  • 저작시기2002.11
  • 파일형식한글(hwp)
  • 자료번호#210058
본 자료는 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원이 없습니다.
청소해
다운로드 장바구니