목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연봉제의 정의
Ⅲ. 연봉제의 도입과 전략적 선택
Ⅲ.1 환경의 압력
Ⅲ.2 연봉제 도입의 촉진요인(Facilitators)과 제약 요인(Constraints)
Ⅲ.3 전략적 선택
Ⅳ. 연봉제 도입의 효과
Ⅳ.1 연봉제 도입여부와 도입전후에 따른 기업성과의 차이
Ⅳ.2 연봉제 도입 기업간의 성과차이
Ⅳ.3 연봉제 도입 기업의 개인 성과차이
Ⅴ. 맺음말
參 考 文 獻
**한글97
Ⅱ. 연봉제의 정의
Ⅲ. 연봉제의 도입과 전략적 선택
Ⅲ.1 환경의 압력
Ⅲ.2 연봉제 도입의 촉진요인(Facilitators)과 제약 요인(Constraints)
Ⅲ.3 전략적 선택
Ⅳ. 연봉제 도입의 효과
Ⅳ.1 연봉제 도입여부와 도입전후에 따른 기업성과의 차이
Ⅳ.2 연봉제 도입 기업간의 성과차이
Ⅳ.3 연봉제 도입 기업의 개인 성과차이
Ⅴ. 맺음말
參 考 文 獻
**한글97
본문내용
.J. DiMaggio, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Fields. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Osterman, P. 1994. "How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?", Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 47, 173-188.
Pearce J. L. (1987), "Why Merit Pay Doesn't Work: Implications from Organizational Theory", in New Perspectives on Compensation, D. B. Balkin & L. R. Gomez-Mejia (Eds.), Prentice-Hall.
Pearce, J. L. & J. L. Perry (1983), Federal Merit Pay: "A Longitudinal Analysis", Public Administration Review 43, 315-325.
Pearce, J. L., W. B. Stevenson and J. L. Perry (1985), "Managerial Compensation Based on Organizational Performance: A Time-Series Analysis of the Impact of Merit Pay", Academy of Management Journal 28, 261-279.
Pfeffer, J., Salansik, G. R. (1978), The External Control of Organizations, New York, Harper & Row, Pub.
Porter M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, New York, Free Press.
Porter M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York, Free Press.
Rockmore B. W. & Scarpello V. Are the Determinants of Pay Plan Effectiveness the Same for American and Foreign Owned Business Units? (Georgia State University working paper, 1993).
Robbins S. P. (1998), Organizational Behavior, 8th (ed). Prentice Hall.
Rotter J. B. (1966), "Generalized Expectations of Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement", Psychological Monographs, Vol.1, No.609.
Schendel D. E. & Hofer C. W. (1979), Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning, Boston, Mass. Little Brown.
Scott, W.R. 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Thompson J. D. (1967), Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill.
Vroom V. H. (1964), Work and Motivation, John Wiley & Son, New York.
Winstanley, N. B. (1982), "Are Merit Increases Really Effective?" Personnel Administrator 4, 37-41.
Wright, P. & Mcmahan, G. C. (1992), Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management, Journal of Management, 18, 295-320.
Theoretical Review on Determinants and Performance Effects of Yeonbongje Pay Systems In Korea
Cyu-Chang Yu·Woo-Sung Park
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes empirically testable propositions regrading "Yeonbong-Je(merit pay systems in Korea)" which recently has been widely accepted in Korean Firms. From a relatively through literature review, we identified that the adoption of such pay system would be explained by technical pressures and institutional pressures. However, firms also would havve a room for strategic choice under the same environmental pressures. We identified that the "Yeonbong-Je" itself would not have much impact on firms' performance and individual performance. Rather, the performance effect of the pay system would be influenced by the congruence between the pay strategy and the firms' strategy, performance evaluation, and job and individual characteristics. Some related issues and practical implications are discussed in conclusion.
Osterman, P. 1994. "How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?", Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 47, 173-188.
Pearce J. L. (1987), "Why Merit Pay Doesn't Work: Implications from Organizational Theory", in New Perspectives on Compensation, D. B. Balkin & L. R. Gomez-Mejia (Eds.), Prentice-Hall.
Pearce, J. L. & J. L. Perry (1983), Federal Merit Pay: "A Longitudinal Analysis", Public Administration Review 43, 315-325.
Pearce, J. L., W. B. Stevenson and J. L. Perry (1985), "Managerial Compensation Based on Organizational Performance: A Time-Series Analysis of the Impact of Merit Pay", Academy of Management Journal 28, 261-279.
Pfeffer, J., Salansik, G. R. (1978), The External Control of Organizations, New York, Harper & Row, Pub.
Porter M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, New York, Free Press.
Porter M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York, Free Press.
Rockmore B. W. & Scarpello V. Are the Determinants of Pay Plan Effectiveness the Same for American and Foreign Owned Business Units? (Georgia State University working paper, 1993).
Robbins S. P. (1998), Organizational Behavior, 8th (ed). Prentice Hall.
Rotter J. B. (1966), "Generalized Expectations of Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement", Psychological Monographs, Vol.1, No.609.
Schendel D. E. & Hofer C. W. (1979), Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning, Boston, Mass. Little Brown.
Scott, W.R. 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Thompson J. D. (1967), Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill.
Vroom V. H. (1964), Work and Motivation, John Wiley & Son, New York.
Winstanley, N. B. (1982), "Are Merit Increases Really Effective?" Personnel Administrator 4, 37-41.
Wright, P. & Mcmahan, G. C. (1992), Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management, Journal of Management, 18, 295-320.
Theoretical Review on Determinants and Performance Effects of Yeonbongje Pay Systems In Korea
Cyu-Chang Yu·Woo-Sung Park
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes empirically testable propositions regrading "Yeonbong-Je(merit pay systems in Korea)" which recently has been widely accepted in Korean Firms. From a relatively through literature review, we identified that the adoption of such pay system would be explained by technical pressures and institutional pressures. However, firms also would havve a room for strategic choice under the same environmental pressures. We identified that the "Yeonbong-Je" itself would not have much impact on firms' performance and individual performance. Rather, the performance effect of the pay system would be influenced by the congruence between the pay strategy and the firms' strategy, performance evaluation, and job and individual characteristics. Some related issues and practical implications are discussed in conclusion.
추천자료
한국 방송 3사의 시청률 차이에 영향을 주는 요인에 관한 연구 - 월드컵
[수요와 수요 법칙][수요와 필요 차이][공급과 공급 법칙][공급 결정요인][케인즈 총수요관리...
[IMF금융위기][IMF]IMF경제위기(외환위기)의 요인, IMF경제위기(금융위기)의 극복 과정, IMF...
[IMF]IMF경제위기(금융위기)의 발생과 요인, 아시아의 IMF경제위기(금융위기) 사례, IMF경제...
하나투어와 모두투어의 성공요인과 차이점
[미생물]미생물의 분류, 미생물의 종류, 미생물의 생장요인, 미생물의 독소와 중독증, 미생물...
인적관리론 - 인사고과, 교육훈련의 목적, 인사고과의 목적, 인사고과의 구성요건, 분류, 임...
[웅진식품 초록매실][웅진식품][초록매실][웅진][식품][고객관리][마케팅]웅진식품 초록매실...
[진로태도성숙][진로태도][진로][진로태도성숙 개념][진로태도성숙 영향요인][진로자아효능감...
소비자심리학 - 회상과 재인의 차이는 무엇이며, 회상과 재인에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대해 ...
구글(Google)의 경영혁신 (구글의 발전사 및 연혁, 글의 혁신 성공전략 및 내용, 구글의 혁신...
[CS][고객만족][제품][고객만족과 제품 선행연구][고객만족과 제품 이슈]CS(고객만족)과 제품...
『네오피델리티(Neofidelity)』 기업분석 (기업의 성장과정, 기업의 문화 및 구조, 기업의 성...