
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39


목차
절차적 공정성, 상호작용적 공정성, 분배적 공정성간의 관계와 역할을 중심으로
Ⅰ. 연구의 배경 및 목적
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설설정
1. 임금만족에 대한 조직공정성의 효과
2. 조직공정성변수간의 관계
Ⅲ. 연구방법
1. 표본설계
2. 변수의 조작적 정의
3. 척도의 평가
4. 공변량구조모형
Ⅳ. 분석결과 및 결과에 대한 논의
1. 주요 분석결과
2. 결과에 대한 논의
Ⅴ. 결 론
참 고 문 헌
**한글97
Ⅰ. 연구의 배경 및 목적
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설설정
1. 임금만족에 대한 조직공정성의 효과
2. 조직공정성변수간의 관계
Ⅲ. 연구방법
1. 표본설계
2. 변수의 조작적 정의
3. 척도의 평가
4. 공변량구조모형
Ⅳ. 분석결과 및 결과에 대한 논의
1. 주요 분석결과
2. 결과에 대한 논의
Ⅴ. 결 론
참 고 문 헌
**한글97
본문내용
f monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36:527- 556.
Rice, R.W., Phillips, S.M., & McFarlin, D.B. 1990. Multiple discrepancies and pay satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75:386-393.
Sapienza, H.J., & Korsgaard, M.A. 1996. Procedural justice in entrepreneur-investor relations. Academy of Management Journal, 39:544-574.
Scarpello, V., Huber.V., & Vandenberg, R.J. 1988. Compensation satisfaction : Its measurement and dimensionality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73:163-171.
Thibaut, J., and Walker,L. 1975. Procedural justice : A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tyler, T.R., and Folger, R. 1980. Distributional and procedural aspect of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1:281-292.
Tyler, T.R. 1984. The role of perceived injustice in defendants' evaluation of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 18:51-74.
Walster,E., Bercheid, B., & Walster, E. 1976. New directions in equity research. In L.Berkowitz & E.Walster (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 9:1-42. New York : Academic Press.
Weiner, N. 1980. Determinants and behavioral consequence of pay satisfaction : A comparison of two models. Personnel Psychology, 33:747-757.
Williams, L.J. & Hazer, J.T. 1986. Antecedents and consequence of satisfaction and commitment in turnover model : A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72:219-231.
A Causal Relationship Between Pay Satisfaction and Organizational Justice Variables
Kyung-Geun Lee·Sung-Soo Park
ABSTRACT
This study aims to examine the relationship between pay satisfaction and organizational justice variables. Many studies on the role of justice factors has been emphasized with distributive and procedural justice. And, the role of interactional justice, defined as the perceived fairness of interpersonal treatment people receive from decision makers, has not fully researched. Moreover, relatively high correlations have been reported among the justice variables, most of research with organizational justice have not explored any causal relationship among the variables.
To test the relationships between pay satisfaction and justice variables, a questionnaire is developed and pre-tested. According to LISREL, the overall adequacy of fit was found to be acceptable. The result showed that distributive justice had significant positive effects on pay satisfaction. Support was also found for a causal relationship among the justice variables. The perceptions of procedural justice had direct and indirect effects on pay satisfaction. But, relationships between interactional justice with pay satisfaction was not supported. And, the notion of past researches that distributive justice predicts more variance than procedural justice with outcome satisfaction was not supported. Lastly, the implications and some limitations of this study were discussed.
Rice, R.W., Phillips, S.M., & McFarlin, D.B. 1990. Multiple discrepancies and pay satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75:386-393.
Sapienza, H.J., & Korsgaard, M.A. 1996. Procedural justice in entrepreneur-investor relations. Academy of Management Journal, 39:544-574.
Scarpello, V., Huber.V., & Vandenberg, R.J. 1988. Compensation satisfaction : Its measurement and dimensionality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73:163-171.
Thibaut, J., and Walker,L. 1975. Procedural justice : A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tyler, T.R., and Folger, R. 1980. Distributional and procedural aspect of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1:281-292.
Tyler, T.R. 1984. The role of perceived injustice in defendants' evaluation of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 18:51-74.
Walster,E., Bercheid, B., & Walster, E. 1976. New directions in equity research. In L.Berkowitz & E.Walster (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 9:1-42. New York : Academic Press.
Weiner, N. 1980. Determinants and behavioral consequence of pay satisfaction : A comparison of two models. Personnel Psychology, 33:747-757.
Williams, L.J. & Hazer, J.T. 1986. Antecedents and consequence of satisfaction and commitment in turnover model : A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72:219-231.
A Causal Relationship Between Pay Satisfaction and Organizational Justice Variables
Kyung-Geun Lee·Sung-Soo Park
ABSTRACT
This study aims to examine the relationship between pay satisfaction and organizational justice variables. Many studies on the role of justice factors has been emphasized with distributive and procedural justice. And, the role of interactional justice, defined as the perceived fairness of interpersonal treatment people receive from decision makers, has not fully researched. Moreover, relatively high correlations have been reported among the justice variables, most of research with organizational justice have not explored any causal relationship among the variables.
To test the relationships between pay satisfaction and justice variables, a questionnaire is developed and pre-tested. According to LISREL, the overall adequacy of fit was found to be acceptable. The result showed that distributive justice had significant positive effects on pay satisfaction. Support was also found for a causal relationship among the justice variables. The perceptions of procedural justice had direct and indirect effects on pay satisfaction. But, relationships between interactional justice with pay satisfaction was not supported. And, the notion of past researches that distributive justice predicts more variance than procedural justice with outcome satisfaction was not supported. Lastly, the implications and some limitations of this study were discussed.
추천자료
공정성이론과 동기부여의 모범사례
[임금][임금이론][임금체계][임금조정사례][임금전망][임금관리제도][임금정책][임금제도][임...
조직행동론
조직효과성의 측정 변인 탐색
조직효과성의 접근방법
조직시민행동
조직몰입도에 관하여
공정성이론(Equity Theory) 사례발표 PPT
아담스의 공정성 이론
조직유효성의 설정기준과 접근방법
[조직행동] 성과급의 보완 수단으로써의 펀경영
임금관리(보상관리)의 중요성, 임금관리(보상관리)의 방침, 임금관리(보상관리)의 체계, 임금...
[기업 임금][기업][임금][기업 임금격차][기업 임금채권][기업 임금양보][기업 임금피크제][...
전략적간호관리] 1전략계획이 무엇인지 설명(전략계획의 과정 포함)하고 의료조직에 전략계획...