성격 비평의 관점에서 본 셰익스피어 연극 미학

목차

1. 전통비평의 셰익스피어 시론과 인물 해석의 관점
2. 성격 비평의 대두와 발전
3. 성격 비평의 한계와 극복, 그리고 열린 해석
4. 인물이 구축하는 셰익스피어 연극 미학

본문내용

VIII, 1977. 144-50.
Coleridge, S. T. George Watson, ed. Biographia Literia. London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1975.
Eastman, Arthur M. A Short History of Shakespearean Criticism, New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc., 1974.
Edwards, Philip. Shakespeare and The Confines of Art. London: Methuen & Co., 1968.
Ellis-Fermor, Una. Kenneth Muir ed., Shakespeare The Dramatist. London: Methuen Co., 1961.
Faas, Ekbert. Shakespeare's Poetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Fokes. R. A., ed. Coleridge's Criticism of Shakespeare. London: Athlone Press, 1989.
Hapgood, Robert. Shakespeare The Theater Poet. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
Hazzlitt, William. Stanley Willaims ed., Essays & Characters. London: Thomas Nelson & /sons Ltd., 1817.
Mackinnon, Lachlan. Shakespeare the Aesthet. London: Macmillan Press, 1988.
Morgann. William Arthur Gill, ed. An Essay on Dramatic Character of Falstaff. London: Henry Frowde, 1912.
Muir, Kenneth. Shakespeare: Contrasts and Contorversies. Univ. of Oklahoma, 1985.
Murry, J. Middleton. Keats and Shakespeare. London: Oxford University Press, 1968.
Nutall, A.D. C.B. Cox and D.J. Palmer, ed. Shakespeare's Wide and Universal Stage. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press, 1984.
Pryor, Felix. The Mirror and the Globe. London: Handsaw, 1992.
Ralli, Augustus. A History of Shakespearean Criticism Vol. I. New York: The Humanities Press, 1965.
Righter, Anne. The Idea of the Play. Harmondsworth: Benguin Books, 1960.
Weimann, Robert. Shakespeare and the popular Tradition in the Theater. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 1978.
White, R.S. Keats, As a Reader of Shakespeare. London: The Athlone Press, 1987.
Shakespearean Aesthetics in Characterization
Abstract Young-Joo, Choi
The discovery of Shakespearean aesthetics was made by Jacobean writers when they mentioned his imagination with scoff as well as derision. His spontaneous overflowing imagination was regarded as the lack of learning and gravity, besides as the whole aspect of his unfamiliar writing style.
The romantic writers developed their imagination theory with the examples of Shakespeare's poetics and his characterization. For them Shakespearean characters are the individuals in their own world through writer's imagination. Bradley touched the summit in this view.
These days critical approach take another turn for Shakespearean characters. New historicists face ideological conflicts of its age through the Shakespearean individuals and his dramatic world. Shakespearean characters are not individuals in the dramatic reality but they reflect the dominating discourse of the society. In this, Shakespearean characters are part of historical context without their subjectivity.
The merit to understand Shakespearean characters as individuals is it enables us to communicate with them beyond the ages. In regarding the plot which develops by the words and actions, the exploitation of Shakespearean aesthetics in characterization should be fathomed to the depth.

키워드

성격비평,   셰익스피어 연극,   전통비평