중앙행정기관의 정부성과 측정의 추진체계와 활용체계 분석

목차

1. 머리말

2. OECD 국가의 정부성과 측정 동향

3. 정부성과 측정에 관한 설문조사결과

4. 정부성과 측정의 개념틀
4.1. 정부성과의 측정체계
4.2. 성과측정 결과의 활용체계
4.3. 정부성과척도의 요건, 한계, 우선 적용분야
4.4. 성과척도의 구성체계
4.4.1. 측정기준별 성과척도
4.4.2. 측정대상별 성과척도
4.4.2.1. 정부의 총괄 성과척도
4.4.2.2. 중앙행정기관의 세입 성과척도
4.4.2.3. 중앙행정기관의 세출 성과척도

5. 맺음말

본문내용

.
---------------(1995c), "Local Authority Performance Indicators," Vol. 3, Police and Fire Services, London, U.K.
---------------(1995d), "Local Authority Performance Indicators," Appendix to Volumes 1 & 2, London, U.K.
Baker, W.V.(1994), "Performance Measurement in Taxation: The Revenue Canada Experience," Performance Measurement in Government: Issues and Illustrations, Public Management Occasional Papers, No. 5, OECD, Paris, France: 41~50.
Bouckaert, G.(1995), Using Performance Measurement in Government, PUMA, OECD.
Davis, D.(1992), "Do You Want a Performance Audit or a Program Evaluation?" Pub;ic Administration Review, Vol 50, No 1: 35~41.
Gore, A.(1993), "Creating A government that Works Better and Costs Less," Report of the National Performance review, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Johnson, R.W. and A.Y. Lewin(1984), "Management and Accountability Models of Public Sector Performance," in Public Sector Performance: A Conceptual Turning Point, edited by T.C. Miller, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A: 224~250.
Lee, R.(1991), "Developments in State Budgeting: Trends of Two Decades," Public Administration Review, Vol. 51, No. 3: 254~262.
Light P. C.(1993), Monitoring Government: Inspectors General and the Search for Accountability, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Mercer, J.(1994), "The Performance Management and Budget System of the City of Sunnyvale, California," Performance Measurement in Government: Issues and Illustrations, Occasional Papers, No. 5, PUMA, OECD: 51~61.
OECD(1987), "Administration as Service: the Public as Client," PUMA, OECD.
-----(1994a), Performance Management in Government: Performance Measurement and Results-oriented Management, Public Management Occasional Papers, No. 3, OECD.
-----(1994b), Performance Measurement in Government: Issues and Illustrations, Public Management Occasional Papers, No. 5, OECD.
-----(1995a), Governance in Transition: Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries, PUMA, OECD.
-----(1995b), Budgeting for Results: Perspectives on Public Expenditure Management, PUMA, OECD.
-----(1995c), Using Performance Measurement in Government: Performance Management in 8 OECD Member Countries, PUMA, OECD.
-----(1996), Responsive Government: Service Quality Initiatives, PUMA, OECD.
Pollitt. C., M. Cave, and R. Joss(1994), "International Benchmarking as a Tool to Improve Public Sector Performance: A Critical Overview," Performance Measurement in Government: Issues and Illustrations, Public Management Occasional Papers, No. 5, OECD: 9~22.
Schick, A.(1990), "Budgeting for Results: Recent Developments in five Industrialized Countries," Public Administration Review, Vol. 50, No. 1: 26~34.
Trosa, S.(1996), "Quality Strategies in Three Countries: France, The United Kingdom and Austrailia," Responsive Government: Service Quality Initiatives, PUMA, OECD: 265~297.
Wholey, J. and H. Hatry(1992), "The Case for Performance Monitoring," Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 6: 604~610.

키워드

중앙행정기관의정부성과측정,   OECD국가의정부성과측정,   정부성과측정에관한설문조사,   정부성과측정의개념틀,   성과측정결과의활용체계,   행정조정실정부업무심사평가,   정부의총괄성과척도,   중앙행정기관의세입성과척도