고령화에 대응하는 복지 과학기술

목차

초록

I. 머리말

II. 인구 고령화: 도전과 기회

1. 인구고령화의 개념과 추이

2. 인구 고령화의 경제적 사회적 도전

3. 인구고령화와 과학기술의 기회

III. 복지 과학기술이란 무엇이고 무엇을 할 수 있나

1. 복지 과학기술의 개념

2. 장애 개념의 패러다임 전환과 복지 과학기술의 접근 변화

3. 보편적 디자인과 복지 과학기술

4. 복지과학기술의 대상

IV. 고령화에 따른 개인-환경 관계 변화와 복지과학기술의 역할

1. 고령화에 따른 개인-환경 관계 변화: 개인적 지체와 구조적 지체

2. 성공적 고령화와 제론테크놀로지

V. 맺음말

참고문헌

본문내용

nology. Amsterdam：IOS Press.
Bouma, Herman. (1992). 'Gerontechnology：Making Technology Relevant for the Elderly', in Bouma, Herman and Graafmans, Jan A.M. (eds.). (1992). Gerontechnology. Amsterdam：IOS Press.
Butler, R.N. (1989). Dispelling ageism：The cross-cutting intervention. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. "The Quality of Aging：Strategies for Intervention", 503, 138-147.
Campbell, Margaret L. (1996). 'A Research Perspective：Next Steps in Bridging the Gap between Aging and Disability', Maximizing Human Potential, Quarterly Newsletter of the Aging, Disability and Rehabilitation Network of the American Society on Aging. 3(4)：1-2.
Campbell, Margaret L. (2001). 'The Promise of Technology as a Caregiving Resource：Supplementing ElderCare with ElderTech', Presentation to Adminstration on Aging Conference on the National Family Caregiver Support Program："From Enactment to Action", September 7.
Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. 2000. Older Americans 2000：Key Indicators of Well-Being. Hyattsville, MD.
Graafmans, J., Taipale, V. and Charness, N. (eds.). 1998. Gerontechnology：A Sustainable Investment in the Future, Amsterdam：IOS Press.
Joint Taskforce on Older People. (2000). Healthcare and Ageing Population Panels. A Foresight Programme report. Department of Trade and Industry. www.foresight.gov.uk.
Keese, Mark and Lee, Jaehung. 2002. 'Older but Wiser：Achieving Better Labour Market Prospects for Older Workers in Korea', paper presented at a seminar organised by the Korea Labour Institute, Seoul, June.
Lawton, M. Powell. (1998). 'Future Society and Technology', J. Graafmans et al. (eds.). Gerontechnology：A Sustainable Investment in the Future. Amsterdam：IOS Press. 12-28.
Martin, Christine (1998). 'Assistive Technology- the Old People's Perspective', I. Placencia and E, Ballabio (eds.), Improving the Quality of Life for the European Citizen. Technology for Inclusive Design and Equality Amsterdam：IOS Press, xliii-xlvii.
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (1999). NIDDR's Long Range Plan - Technology for Access and Function Research.
OECD (2001), The Well-Being of Nations, Paris.
Riley, Matilda. W. and Riley, John. W. (1994). Structural lag：past and future. in M.W. Riley, R.L. Kahn and A. Foner (eds.), Age and Structural Lag. New York：Wiley-Interscience, 15-36.
Riley, M.W., Foner, A. and Riley, J.W. (1999). The Aging Society Paradigm, in V. L. Bengston and K. W. Schaie (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Aging, New York：Springer Publishing, 327-343.
Rowe, John W. and Kahn, Robert L. (1998). Successful Aging. New York：Dell Publishing.
Seelman, Katherine D. (1998). ‘Disability's New Paradigm：Implications for Assistive Technology and Universal Design', I. Placencia and E, Ballabio (eds.), Improving the Quality of Life for the European Citizen. Amsterdam：IOS Press, xx-xxiv.
UN Population Division. (2000). The Sex and Age Distribution of World Population. New York：the United Nations.

키워드

고령화,   복지,   과학기술