연구인력의 연봉제 선호인식의 결정요인과 결과요인에 관한 연구

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
1. 연구의 목적
2. 연구 방법 및 범위

Ⅱ. 국내.외 연봉제의 도입 현황
1. 선진국의 연봉제 동향
2. 우리나라 기업의 연봉제 도입 실태
3. 선진국과 우리나라 기업의 연봉제 비교 및 시사점

Ⅲ. 과학기술계 정부출연 연구기관의 연봉제
1. 정부출연 연구기관의 연봉제 도입시 고려사항
2. 과학기술계 정부출연 연구기관의 연봉제

Ⅳ. 실증연구의 설계
1. 연구모형 및 가설의 설정
2. 변수의 조작적 정의 및 측정
3. 표본 선정 및 설문지 구성

Ⅴ. 실증분석 결과
1. 설문결과의 기초통계량
2. 설문지의 신뢰도 검증
3. 가설 검증

Ⅵ. 결 론
1. 연구결과의 요약 및 시사점
2. 연구의 의의 및 한계

본문내용

개선에 관한 연구
25. 호남대 경영경제연구소, 한국기업의 연봉제 도입에 관한 소고, 경상연구, 1996, 3월호.
26. 황정현(1988), 임금동기 유발을 위한 임금체계 도입 방안에 관한 실증연구,
중앙대 박사학위논문
Ⅱ. 國外文獻
1. A.D.Szilagyi, & M.J. Wallace(1983), Organizational Behavior and Performance, Scott, Foresman and Co.
2. Allen,N.J., Meyer,J.P. & Smith,C.A.(1993), Commitment to organization and occupation : Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.78, no.4
3. Barnard Berelson and Gray A. Steiner(1964), Human Behavior. New York : Harcuort, Brace & World, Inc.
4. Cranny.S.P, Smith,P.C & Stone, E.F.(1992), Job Satisfaction, New York, Lexington Book
5. D.F. Drucker (1973), Management : Task-Responsibilities Practices, N.Y. : Harper, 6. D. Katz, & L.K. Robert (1966), The Social Phychology of Organization, N.Y.: John Willey & Sons
7. Hacket, R.D., Bycio, P. & Housdorf, P.A.(1994), Further Assessments of Meyer & Allen's 919910 3-Component Model of Organizational Commitmemt, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.79
8. J.W.Atkinson (1964), An Introduction to Motivation, (N.J. : Nostrand Reinhold)
9. L.A. Porter & E. E. Lawer (1968), Managerial Attitutes and Performance, Irwin, 10. Loke,E.A.(1976), The Nature & Causes of Job Satisfaction", Handbook of Industrial & Organizational Psychology
11. Mowday, R.T.,Porter, L.W. & Steers, R.M.(1982), Employee-Organization Linkages : The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism & Turnover, New York, Academic Press
12. Pearce, J.L.& Perry, JL.(1983), Federal Merit Pay, Public Administration Review
13. Robbins, S.P.(1996), Organizational Behavior(7th Edition), Englewood
Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall
14. S.E. Seashore, & E. Yuchtman (1976), Factorial analysis of organizational effectiveness. ASQ, Dec.
15. Tharp, C.G.(1986), Linking Annual Incentives & Individual Performance, Personnel Administrator
16. W.J.Duncan (1981), Organizational Behavior, Boston : Houghton Mifflin Co.
A Study on the Determinants and Consequences of
Preference for Annual Salary System in Research Institutes
Tae-Boong In
Beom-Ku Chung
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to induce the recognition types of the annual salary system preferred by employees of 10 research institutes which are supported by the Korean government and analyze the impact that personal factors and performance factors give to the preference of the annual salary system and the difference between preference and practicability of the annual salary system gives to organizational effectiveness.
The result of practical analysis for the variables are as follows:
First, the preference of the annual salary system was found to be affected by job category, classification, education level, and service year of employees.
Second, the preference of the annual salary system was found to be affected by employee's salary level and performance evaluation.
Third, the difference between preference and practicability for the annual salary system was found to affect job satisfaction, organizational commitment and motivation.

키워드

연구인력,   연봉제,   선진국형연봉제,   연구인력,   연구기관,   연봉제 도입