목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 지방자치단체 성과평가의 개념 틀
Ⅲ. 지방자치단체 성과평가의 국내·외 사례와 시사점
Ⅳ. 지방자치단체 성과평가체제의 구축방향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Ⅱ. 지방자치단체 성과평가의 개념 틀
Ⅲ. 지방자치단체 성과평가의 국내·외 사례와 시사점
Ⅳ. 지방자치단체 성과평가체제의 구축방향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
본문내용
도 도입방안 연구」, 한국지방행정연구원, 1999.
매일경제신문사. 「지방자치 경영평가」, 1996.
박재완. "지방자치단체의 성과지표 개발: 논점과 예시," 「한국지방재정논집」, 제4권 제1호, 한국지방재정학회, 1999: 159~178,
양기용ㆍ김상묵. "행정서비스 성과평가제도의 도입과 적용: 경기도의 경험과 교훈," 「한국정책학회보」, 제7권 제3호, 1998: 11~30.
우동기. "지방자치단체 경영진단 모형개발을 위한 시론," 「지방자치연구」, 제8권 제2호, 1996: 79~107.
정정길ㆍ김신복ㆍ오연천ㆍ이달곤. 「민선 지방자치 1년의 평가와 과제」, 한국행정연구소 총서 4, 서울대학교 행정대학원, 1996.
중앙일보사. 「전국 74개 市 비교평가 자료집: 삶의 질 입체분석」, 1995.
최병대ㆍ김상묵ㆍ양기용ㆍ송광태ㆍ윤의영ㆍ정지연. 「자치구 구정진단을 위한 모형개발에 관한 연구」, 서울시정개발연구원, 1995.
City of Charlotte, Corporate Performance Report: FY00 Year-End, Charlotte, NC: Budget and Evaluation Department, 2000.
GAO. Executive Guide: Leading Practices in Capital Decision-Making, 1998.
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), Concepts Statement No. 2 on Concepts Related to Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting, Norwalk, CT: GASB, 1994.
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA), Survey of State and Local Government Use and Reporting of Performance Measures: First Questionnaire Results, Norwalk, CT: GASB, 1997.
Hartry, P. H. and D. M. Fisk. "Measuring Productivity in the Public Sector," Public Productivity Handbook, edited by M. Holzer, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1992: 139~160.
Ingraham, Patricia W., Philip G. Joyce, and Amy Kneedler, Managing for Performance, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1999.
Jacksonville Community Council(JCCI), Quality of Life in Jacksonville: Indicators for Progress, Jacksonville, Florida: Jacksonville Community Council, Inc., 1999a.
Jacksonville Community Council(JCCI), Creating a Community Agenda: Indicators for Health and Human Services, Jacksonville, Florida: Jacksonville Community Council, Inc., 1999b.
Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton. "The Balanced Scorecard: Measures Theat Drive Performance," Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992: 71~79.
......................................... The Strategy-Focused Organization, Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
Multnomah County Central CBAC, Central Citizen Budget Advisory Committee and Citizen Budget Advisory Committees Budget Recommendations and Dedicated Fund Review, Portland, Oregon: Multnomah County Citizen Involvement Committee, 1998.
OECD. Responsive Government: Service Quality Initiatives, PUMA, 1996.
Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
Pollitt. C., M. Cave, and R. Joss. "International Benchmarking as a Tool to Improve Public Sector Performance: A Critical Overview," Performance Measurement in Government: Issues and Illustrations, Public Management Occasional Papers, No. 5, OECD, 1994: 9~22.
Skyrme, D. J. and D. M. Amidon. "New Measures of Success," Journal of Business Strategy, 19(1), 1998: 20~24.
Smith, Peter. ed. Measuring Outcome in the Public Sector, Taylor and Francis Ltd, 1996.
Sustainable Seattle, Indicators of a Sustainable Community, Seattle, 1993.
Synnerstr m, S. Introduction of an Performance Evaluation System into the Public Sector, PUMA, OECD, 1999.
매일경제신문사. 「지방자치 경영평가」, 1996.
박재완. "지방자치단체의 성과지표 개발: 논점과 예시," 「한국지방재정논집」, 제4권 제1호, 한국지방재정학회, 1999: 159~178,
양기용ㆍ김상묵. "행정서비스 성과평가제도의 도입과 적용: 경기도의 경험과 교훈," 「한국정책학회보」, 제7권 제3호, 1998: 11~30.
우동기. "지방자치단체 경영진단 모형개발을 위한 시론," 「지방자치연구」, 제8권 제2호, 1996: 79~107.
정정길ㆍ김신복ㆍ오연천ㆍ이달곤. 「민선 지방자치 1년의 평가와 과제」, 한국행정연구소 총서 4, 서울대학교 행정대학원, 1996.
중앙일보사. 「전국 74개 市 비교평가 자료집: 삶의 질 입체분석」, 1995.
최병대ㆍ김상묵ㆍ양기용ㆍ송광태ㆍ윤의영ㆍ정지연. 「자치구 구정진단을 위한 모형개발에 관한 연구」, 서울시정개발연구원, 1995.
City of Charlotte, Corporate Performance Report: FY00 Year-End, Charlotte, NC: Budget and Evaluation Department, 2000.
GAO. Executive Guide: Leading Practices in Capital Decision-Making, 1998.
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), Concepts Statement No. 2 on Concepts Related to Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting, Norwalk, CT: GASB, 1994.
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA), Survey of State and Local Government Use and Reporting of Performance Measures: First Questionnaire Results, Norwalk, CT: GASB, 1997.
Hartry, P. H. and D. M. Fisk. "Measuring Productivity in the Public Sector," Public Productivity Handbook, edited by M. Holzer, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1992: 139~160.
Ingraham, Patricia W., Philip G. Joyce, and Amy Kneedler, Managing for Performance, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1999.
Jacksonville Community Council(JCCI), Quality of Life in Jacksonville: Indicators for Progress, Jacksonville, Florida: Jacksonville Community Council, Inc., 1999a.
Jacksonville Community Council(JCCI), Creating a Community Agenda: Indicators for Health and Human Services, Jacksonville, Florida: Jacksonville Community Council, Inc., 1999b.
Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton. "The Balanced Scorecard: Measures Theat Drive Performance," Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992: 71~79.
......................................... The Strategy-Focused Organization, Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
Multnomah County Central CBAC, Central Citizen Budget Advisory Committee and Citizen Budget Advisory Committees Budget Recommendations and Dedicated Fund Review, Portland, Oregon: Multnomah County Citizen Involvement Committee, 1998.
OECD. Responsive Government: Service Quality Initiatives, PUMA, 1996.
Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
Pollitt. C., M. Cave, and R. Joss. "International Benchmarking as a Tool to Improve Public Sector Performance: A Critical Overview," Performance Measurement in Government: Issues and Illustrations, Public Management Occasional Papers, No. 5, OECD, 1994: 9~22.
Skyrme, D. J. and D. M. Amidon. "New Measures of Success," Journal of Business Strategy, 19(1), 1998: 20~24.
Smith, Peter. ed. Measuring Outcome in the Public Sector, Taylor and Francis Ltd, 1996.
Sustainable Seattle, Indicators of a Sustainable Community, Seattle, 1993.
Synnerstr m, S. Introduction of an Performance Evaluation System into the Public Sector, PUMA, OECD, 1999.
추천자료
지방의회와 지방자치단체장(기관대립형, 기관통합형)
지방의회와 지방자치단체장의 지위와 권한
지방자치단체의 예산낭비 실태 및 사례분석 - 공무원의 문제와 예산낭비, 정책결정체제의 문...
[지역경제][지방경제][지방재정][금융][재정분권화][지방경제 재정확충 방안][지방자치단체]...
지방자치단체법상 지방자치단체의 기관
지방자치법상 지방자치단체의 구성요소
지방자치단체와 자치권) 자치권의 의의, 개념, 학설 및 종류
[지방자치단체] 지방자치단체의 의의와 종류
지방자치단체에 대한 국가의 감독과 국가에 대한 영향력의 행사, 국가와 지방자치단체간의 분...
[국제협력, 인터넷규제, 한반도통일, 지방자치단체(지자체)]국제협력과 인터넷규제, 국제협력...
자치단체(自治團體)의 통제 (지방의회와 지방자치단체와의 관계, 지방의회에 의한 통제)
지방자치단체장의 의의(개념정의), 지방자치단체장 권한과 역할
지방자치단체장 부패의 의의(개념정의), 부패실태, 부패요인, 부패방지전략, 우리나라(한국) ...