6.고급수출 및 수입 영어시뮬레이션 심화과정
본 자료는 3페이지 의 미리보기를 제공합니다. 이미지를 클릭하여 주세요.
닫기
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
해당 자료는 3페이지 까지만 미리보기를 제공합니다.
3페이지 이후부터 다운로드 후 확인할 수 있습니다.

소개글

6.고급수출 및 수입 영어시뮬레이션 심화과정에 대한 보고서 자료입니다.

목차

목 차
고급수출 및 수입영어시뮬레이션 심화과정 VI
1. 회신작성 시뮬레이션

본문내용

instructed all the people concerned in UNIPIA to study it carefully from every angle. Before discussing their conclusions, however, I\'d like to present the current position of our company here.
Smith : Let us discuss the share of investment rates with a complete product line if we were to expect sales to develop profitably from our stand point of view.
Yoon : Fine. I\'d like to discuss the investment ratio and the composition of the staff to be dispatched from each side. I see in your proposal that your suggesting an 8 to 2 ratio with your company holding major share. We\'d like it set up on a 50-50 basis. As for the people in charge we can agree to your providing the president as outlined in your proposal. But we\'d like to provide the plant manager as well as the technical supervisor.
Smith : I\'m afraid that would be very difficult for us to go along with. To start with we couldn\'t consider a 50-50 investment ratio. My feeling is that equal investment leads to ambiguity of responsibility which we would want to avoid at all costs. I realize that joint venture proposals with Korean companies often stipulate equal investment, but as you know, such propositions are almost never agreed to by American companies. I\'m sure you\'re aware that our company is involved many joint venture agreement on a 50-50 basis. We firmly believe that one of the partners must maintain leadership. The problem, of course, is which partner. Naturally, we believe the venture would process more smoothly if the leadership were in our hands. Before talking about actual percentages, I feel we must come to an agreement on this point
Yoon : I see your point. But even if your company were to handle the marketing activities. that doesn\'t mean the ratio must be 8 to 2. Even if your company keeps control we\'d like to be as close to equal as possible. Let\'s say 51 to 49 or at the most 6 to 4, Mr Smith.
Smith : I don\'t think so. I still believe that a clear majority is necessary if responsibility is to be clearly defined. How about 7 to 3? That is a key point of our Joint Venture agreement.
Yoon: I really don\'t see that 7 to 3 is very difficult from 8 to 2. Even if the overall control goes to your company, we\'d still prefer as close to equal investment as possible. Our people will have more reason to work at this venture if our investment share is high. Furthermore, when it comes to decision making with regard to important matter, we\'d have to insist on the right of refusal, whatever share we held.
Smith : Yes, well……. well, I can understand that I think we can come around to your 6 to 4 idea. But the ratio of financial support must be at the same rate. Is that acceptable,Mr Yoon ?
Yoon : Taking into account the fact that the investment ratio has changed since the original proposal. We can agree to that, Mr smith.
Smith : Yes, we finally agree the investment rates with satisfaction for both of company. We would highly appreciate your full efforts. Well, let us call it today. Thanks a lot.
  • 가격1,500
  • 페이지수10페이지
  • 등록일2013.09.30
  • 저작시기2013.9
  • 파일형식한글(hwp)
  • 자료번호#5238702
본 자료는 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원이 없습니다.
다운로드 장바구니