|
levels of convergence. In Giles, H. and St Clair, R.(eds.). Language Social Psychology, Basil Blackwell.
Hilles, S.(1986). Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter, Second Language Research 2, pp.33-52.
Hirakawa, M.(1990). A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives, Second Language Researc
|
|
|
syntactic level에서 동일 하게 유지되어야 한다는 것
ex) a. [NP e] was killed John by Fred (D-structure)
b. Johni was killed ti by Fred (S-structure) 1. Ambiguity (중의성)
2. Complementizer (보문소)
3. 심층구조 vs. 표층구조(eager와 easy의 비교)
4. 명사구에서의 보어(comp
|
|
|
Level):
RL: EL: LA: LQ:
② 어의영역(Semantic Area): 어휘 의미표현
③ 구문영역(Syntactic Area): 어순(이해 , 표현) 형태소(조사사용 ) MLU
④ 화용영역(Pragmatic Area): 언어사용 화용규칙
2) 실어증:Wernicke/ TCS/ Conduction/ Anomic/ Broca/ TCM/ Global/ Isolation
3) 실행증 /
|
|
|
levels. This is referred to as X-bar theory.
XP
specifier X\'
X(head) complement
→ The schema says that an XP consists of a specifier, which is basically a modifier, and an X\'
VP → Aux VP
VP
Aux VP
Aux VP
Aux VP
→ In sentences without auxiliaries, the tense of the sentence is its head Instead of h
|
|
메뉴펼치기
