자기결정이론과 모델에 대한 비판
본 자료는 7페이지 의 미리보기를 제공합니다. 이미지를 클릭하여 주세요.
닫기
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
해당 자료는 7페이지 까지만 미리보기를 제공합니다.
7페이지 이후부터 다운로드 후 확인할 수 있습니다.

소개글

자기결정이론과 모델에 대한 비판에 대한 보고서 자료입니다.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
1. 연구의 필요성
2. 연구의 목적
3. 연구 방법

Ⅱ. 자기결정 이론

Ⅲ. 자기결정 모델

Ⅳ. 결론 및 논의

본문내용

lf-determination: Critical skills for outcome-oriented transition services. Journal of Vocational Special Needs Education, 15(1), 3-7.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (1995). The Arc's self-determination scale: Procedural guidelines. Arling, TX: The Arc.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (1996a). Self-determination for youth wit significant disabilities: From theory to practice. In L. E. Power, G. H. Singer, & J. Sowers(Eds.). On the road to autonomy: Promoting self-competence in children and youth with disabilities (pp. 115-134). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (1997). Self-determination as an educational outcome:A definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9(3), 175-209.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Kelchner, K. & Richards, S. (1995). Individual and environmental factors related to self-determination of adults with mental retardation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 291-305.
Wehmeyer, M., & Ward, M. J. (1995). The spirit of IDEA mandate : Student involvement in transition planning. Journal of the Association for Vocational Special Needs Education, 17, 108-111.
Whitman, T. L. (1990). Self-regulation and mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 347-362.
A Study on Theories and Models of Self-Determination
Hye-kyung Kim
The purpose of this study is to explore the theories and models of self-determination. The first part of this study addresses the theories of self-determination. Theories provide individuals with a foundation of why and how think and behave. This is accomplished by first briefly describing the theories that are directly or indirectly related to self-determination.
These included are (a) the cognitive evaluation theory, (b) the self-regulation theory, (c) the self-efficacy theory, (d) the equal opportunity theory. These theories emphasized the role that a society perform in the development of an individual's self-determination. At the same time, the society must furnish the individual with the opportunities to express their self-determination.
The second part of this study addresses the models of self-determination. The theories of self-determination lay the foundation for the self-determination models, A model is an abstract representation of a phenomenon or system.
In this case, the models represent various aspects of the self-determination theories. There are four predominate models of self-determination. They include (a) Mithaug, Campeau, and Wolman's model, (b) Abery's ecosystem model, (c) Wehmeyer's model, and (d) Field, and Hoffman's model.
These models are multifaceted with an emphasis on the individual within various environments. The model takes into consideration the skills base, the knowledge base, and the motivational base of individual within an ecosystem framework. From this perspective, to gain a better understanding of the level of self-determination of individuals, one must understand the interaction between the individual and the environment.
  • 가격3,000
  • 페이지수22페이지
  • 등록일2006.02.28
  • 저작시기2006.02
  • 파일형식한글(hwp)
  • 자료번호#337895
본 자료는 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원이 없습니다.
청소해
다운로드 장바구니