미국 수행평가 연구방향에 대한 분석적 고찰: 우리에게 주는 시사점

목차

Ⅰ. 시작하는 말

Ⅱ. 수행평가: 학교교육과정과 수업개혁의 출발점

Ⅲ. 미국 수행평가 연구의 네 가지 방향
1. 성취기준
2. 평가기준표
3. 수행과제
4. 새로운 성적표 양식

Ⅳ. 끝맺는 말

본문내용

hievement cycle. New York: Eye on education, Inc.
Guskey, T. (eds.)(1996). Communicating student learning. Virginia: ASCD.
Kellaghan, T., & Madaus, G. (1991). National testing: Lessons for America from Europe. Educational Leadership, 49(3), pp.87-93.
Herman, J. L., & Golan, S.(1991). Effects of standardized testing on teachers and learning: Another look(CSE Tech. Rep. No.334). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
Khattri, N., Reeve, A., & Kane, M. (1998). Principles and practices of performance assessment. New Jersey: Lawrence erlbaum associates.
Kohn, A.(1994). Reporting what student are learning. Educational Leadership.
Lazear, D.(1998). The rubrics way: Using MI to assess understanding. Arizona: Zephyr Press.
McDonald, J. (1993). Graduation by exhibition: Assessing genuine achievement. Virginia: ASCD.
Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes. Virginia: ASCD.
Marzano, R.(2000). Transforming classroom grading. Virginia: ASCD.
Mitchell, R. (1992). Testing for learning: How new approaches to evaluation can improve American schools. New York: The Free Press.
National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing(2002). 중학교 과학과 수행과제 자료집. 미간행 자료, University of California at Los Angeles.
Newmann and Associates.(1996). Authentic achievement: Resturcturing schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Osborne, N.(1999). Rubrics for elementary assessment. Michigan: Osborne Press.
Osher, C., Summer, J., & Andren, P. (1998). Senior project in focus: An album of close-ups. Oregon: Far West Edge.
Pacific Education Group(2001). 미국 캘리포니아 고등학교를 위한 새로운 성적표 양식 개발 작업 보고서. 미 간행 자료.
Pollock, J. (1995). Designing authentic tasks and scoring rubrics. Virginia: ASCD.
Robinson, G., & Craver, J. (1988). Assessing and grading student achievement. Virginia: Educational Research Service.
Shepard, L.(1991). Will national tests improve student learning?(CSE Tech. Rep. NO.342). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
Steinberg, A., Cushman, K., & Riordan, R.(1999). Schooling for the real world: The essential guide to rigorous and relevant learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tschudi, S.(ed.). (1997). Alternatives to grading student writing. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
US Department of Labor.(1991). What work requires of schools: A scans report for America 2000. The Secretary's commission on achieving necessary skills. June. US Department of Labor.
Uchida, D. (1998). Preparing students for the 21st century. American Association of school administrators.
Weinstein, C., & Meyer, D.(1991). Implications of cognitive psychology for testing: Contributions from work in learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock and E. L. Baker(Eds.), Testing and Cognition(pp.40-61). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentica Hall.
Wiggins, G.(1998). Educative Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

키워드

김영천,   교육과정,   진주교대,   수행평가,   미국