|
talk
3.성(性)차에 따라 TV의 사용
4.상호협조(MUTUAL AID)
5.그룹인터뷰의 장. 단점
Ⅲ.시청규약과 새로운 시청자.
1.산만한(distracted) 시청(viewing)
2.다양한 시청행태
3.기술의 습득.
Ⅲ. Referential and Critical Framing
<1>.참고적 구성(Refe
|
|
|
Talking to \"the man\": Some communication strategies used by members of \"subordinate\" social groups. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 67, 21-30.
Triandis, H. C. (1976). The future of pluralism. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 179-208.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science fo
|
|
|
and Decoding, (British Film Institute,1980)
D.Morley, Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure, (Comedia Publishing Group, 1986)
W. Russell Neuman, The Future of The Mass Audience, (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991).
M.Poster, The Mode of Information, (Polity Press, 1990)
M.Poster, Critica
|
|
|
a Community: A Study of Dagenham after Forty Years. Londom: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Winn, M. (1977). The Plug-In Drug. New York: The Viking Press. - 차 례 -
I. 들어가는 말
II. 현대사회의 텔레비전에 대한 의존
III. 생활양식의 사사화와 텔레비전
IV. 맺는 말
|
|
|
and Television News. London: Sage.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), pp. 51-58.
Ericson R., P. Baranek & J. Chan. (1991). Negotiation, Control. London: Milton Keynes.
Gersh, D. (1992). Promulgating Polarization: Study finds
|
|
 |
and the Idea of America\'. Asian American History and Culture. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 2004.
<외부 링크>
India English Literature Forum
India English Literature Blog
A Bangla Review on Prof Fakrul Alam\'s book on South Asian Literature
INDIAN LITERATURE: A Critical Casebook
(참고자료: \"
|
|
메뉴펼치기
