|
linguistic modelling
(1) Serial versus parallel processing models
(2) Single-route versus multiple-route models
(3) Symbolic versus connectionist models
2. Which model is right?
<참고문헌>
Contemporary Linguistic Analysis, 6th Edition (William D. O\'Grady | Pearson Education | 2008) e
|
|
|
linguistic input: Second language learning in classrooms. In L. C.Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom, New York: Academic Press, 1982.
17. Gebhard, J., G., Some suggestions for the EFL conversation class, Forum 20,1982.
18. Jack C. Richards and Theadore S. Rodgers, Approaches and Methods
|
|
|
Methods, which has caused Korean Language learners to recognize Korean Grammar is an very difficult subject. Meanwhile, when teaching Korean grammar in Vietnam, if applying Contrastive Linguistic Methods on Korean with Vietnamese Language and researched analysis results of similarities and dissimila
|
|
|
Methode de Traduction
J.Deslile (1981) L\'enseignement de l\'Interpretation et de la Traduction
C.Durieux (1988) Fondement Didactique de la Traduction Technique
A.Hurtado Albir (1990) La Notion de Fidelite en Traduction
J. Piaget (1970) Epistemologie des Science de l\'Homme
A.Pym (1993) Epistem
|
|
|
method)의 도입으로 문법의 중요성에 대한 인식이 저하되었다. 그 후 인지주의 교수법(cognitive method)의 등장으로 문법 교육이 강조되었으나 Chomsky의 언어 능력(linguistic competence) 개념을 비판하는 Dell Hymes(1971)의 의사 소통 능력이론에 입각한 의사
|
|
 |
A comparative study of teacher talk in English class between English L1 and Chinese L1 Teacher. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 28(3), Great achievements on classroom discourse research has been made in China and empirical research using the method of discourse analysis on teacher talk
|
|
|
Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
Strauber, S. K. (1982). Using alternate methods in EFL/ESL clauses. Paper presented at the Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Louisville, KY., April 22-24.
Thornbury, S. (2000). How to teach grammar. London: Longman.
Yoshida, N. J. (1985). Garme
|
|
메뉴펼치기
