|
Pragmatics is the study of how language is affected by context, and Semantics is the study of linguistic meaning. Both are about meaningful context of language. Actually, it is hard to consider them in the Korean ELT context. If students are in the real world, they would misunderstand the actual mea
|
|
|
들어가며
B. 본문
1. 문장의 중의성
1.1 어휘적 중의성
1.2. 구조적 중의성
1.3. 비유적 중의성
1.4. 정리
2. 화용론 (pragmatics)
2.1. 화용론의 정의
2.2 문장과 발화
2.3. 대화 상황, 맥락
2.4. 대화 협력의 원리
3. 중의성의 해소
C. 맺으며
|
|
|
Pragmatics 31.
Lee, Hyo Sang(2000), “Discourse-pragmatics of adversative connectives: A Comparison among Korean, English, and Japanese.” A paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Korean Linguistics, July 13-15, 2000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lee, Hyo Sang and Sandra A. Thompson(1989),
|
|
|
Pragmatics: From Theory to Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice Hall.
Fey, M.E. (1986). Language Intervention with Young Children. San Diego：Little, Brown and Company.
Gallagher, T. M. (1991). Pragmatics of language：Clinical practice issues. San Diego, CA：Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
|
|
|
를)을 사용하기 시작한다.
(1) 아이: \"왜 울어?\", \"어떻게 만들어?\", \"이게 뭐 하는 거야?\" (모든 의문사를 사용해서 문장을 만들어 질문할 수 있게 된다.)
(2) 아이: “엄마 뭘 만들어? 엄마! 뭘 만들어?” (엄마가 종이 접기를 하는 것을 보고 물
|
|
 |
pragmatics and morphemics. Fourth, as for integration with other life topics, social life was most widely integrated with activities, followed by inquiry, expression and health life. Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
1. 분석대상
2. 분석기준
1) 언어교육 활동의 내용체계 분석기
|
|
|
\'environment and living\'. Third, the order of the frequent language instruction type is by syntax, semantics, phonology, pragmatics and morphemics. Fourth, as for integration with other life topics, social life was most widely integrated with activities, followed by inquiry, expression and health
|
|
메뉴펼치기
