|
- 3 / 2번 비교를 추가적으로 더 해아만 한다. 그러므로 총 n / 2 + n - 3 / 2 = 3n / 2 - 3 / 2번 비교를 한다.
2. If n is 4, draw Decision Tree about the algorithm 1.3.
int findMax(E, n)
1. max = E[0] ;
2. for (index = 1 ; index < n ; index++)
3. if (max < E[index])
4. max = E[index] ;
5. re
|
|
|
충분하다고 본다. 대립적 민주주의를 넘어서
-Beyond Advers
ary Democracy-
I. 민주주의와 다수결원칙
II. 대립적 민주주의와 합의적 민주주의 (Adversary Democracy vs. Unitary Democracy)
III. 다수결원칙 적용의 기본 전제
IV. 비판 및 결론
|
|
|
04). Retrieved July, 15th 2008 from http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules /fre/Vidmar, N. (2005). Expert evidence, the adversary system, and the jury. American Journal of Public Health, 95, (S1), 137-143.
|
|
|
Company Ltd. et al. v. Carmichael et al., 526 U.S. 137 (1999).
Langbein, J. H. (2003). The origins of adversary criminal trial: Oxford University Press.
Senate Bill 459, 42d Leg., 1st Sess, N.M. 1995 법정 심리전문가의 자격:
심리전문가 증언의 범위:
심리 전문가 증언에 대한 쟁점들:
|
|
|
1. Proposition
In the war history of the world, there are many wars caused by misperceptions. The misperceptions include misperception of the adversary’s capabilities, misperception of the adversary’s intentions, and misperceptions of third states. As we can see in the historical examples, unfort
|
|
메뉴펼치기
