야생조류의 가치평가에 관한 연구

목차

초 녹

I. 서론
1. 연구의 배경
2. 연구의 목적

II. 연구사
1. 가치의 개념
2. 야생동물의 가치 체계에 관한 연구
(1) 자원적인 측면에서 본 분류체계
(2) 이용의 측면에서 본 가치체계
3. 야생동물의 가치 평가에 관한 연구

III. 연구대상 및 연구방법
1. 연구대상
(1) 연구대상지
(2) 연구대상
2. 가치평가방법의 선택
(1)비시장재의 가치평가방법
(2) 임의가치법
(3) 몇가지 약점과 강점
3. 평가모델의 선정
(1) 일반리론
(2) 모델의 형태
(3) 복지변화의 측정(동등잉여의 측정)
(4) 이선반응의 추정식
4. 자료 수집
(1) 현지설문조사
(2) 표본추출방법
(3) 지불의사 추정을 위한 자료수집의 두가지 방법
5. 자료 분석

IV. 결과 및 고찰
1. 야생동물의 가치체계의 정립
(1) 자원중심적 가치체계
(2) 자원중심적 가치체계의 한계
(3) 기존의 이용중심적 가치체계의 문제점
(4) 이용중심적 가치체계의 재정립
2. 설문분석결과
(1) 응답자의 사회경제적 특성
(2) 크낙새에 대한 응답자의 생각
(3) 비희귀 야생조류에 대한 이용자의 생각
(4) 기부금 참여의사 분석
(5) 기타질문사항
3. 모델을 이용한 존재가치 평가
(1) 희귀야생조류의 존재가치평가.
(2) 비희귀 야생조류의 존재가치평가
4. 추정치의 적합성 검토
(1) (방법 1)의 적합성 여부
(2) (방법 2)의 적합성 여부
(3) 두 모델의 비교
V. 결론 및 제언

본문내용

associated recreation, 100 pp.
98. Walsh, R. G., J. B. Loomis and R. S. Gillman, 1984, Valuing option, existence and bequest demand for willderness, Land Economics 60:14-29.
99. Weisbrod B., 1964, Collective-consumption services of individual- consumption goods, Quarterly Journal of Economics 78(3):471-477.
100. Witter, Daniel J. and William W Shaw, 1979, Beliefs of birders, hunters, and wildlife professionals about wildlife management, Transactions North American Wildlife Conference 44:298-305.
ABSTRACT
This study used the utility difference function for C.V. Method to estimate the existence value of the wildbirds(endangered species and non-endangered species) in Kwangrung Area.
First, this study proposed 4 categories for Wildlife value - Current Consumption Use Value, Current Nonconsumption Use Value, Future Use Value, Non-use Value and then estimated the existence value of the wildbirds.
In this study, System for Categorizing Wildlife Value was as follows ;
+-C. Consumptive Use Value
+-Current Use Value-+
+-Use Value-+ +-C. Noncunsumptive Use Value
| +-Future Use Value : Option Value, Quasi-Option Value
|
Total Value -+
+-Non-use Value
To estimate the existence value of endangered species(Dryocopuss Javensis richardsi ; White - bellied Black Woodpecker), 300 visitors(mostly from visitors;adults only 18 years or older) to the Kwangrung Arboretum and residents in three counties of Kurye, Sunchang and Chunchon(typical rural area).
To estimate the existence value of non-endangered species, this study surveyed Korean adults(18 years or older) who visited Kwangrung Arboretum.
The WTP of preservating for endangered species was 38,739 won/1 year/1 person by Kwangrug Arboretum vistors and 23,268 won by rural resident. The WTP of preservating for non-endangered species was 23,196 won by Kwangrug Arboretum vistors.
In case of endangered species, the variables related WTP were age for Kwangrung model, age and education level for rural models. But in case of non-endangered species, the variables related WTP was the prior experience of watching the wildbirds.
In this study, the model I turned out the best model to estimate wildbirds value in terms of model performance, correct prediction adn Log-likelyhood ratio.
The respondent who were willing to pay for those birds thought the bequest value is more important than any other values and the intrinsic value was the second important value. It showed the WTP price was so much related the use value. So the WTP price suggested in this study could be the preservation value rather than the existence value.
In this study, the data was corrected by two types methods. The respondents, who had not willingness to pay for those birds, were excluded by the type 1 method, while the type 2 method include all respondents. Comparing the results, the WTP price was overestimated in type 1 and was underestimated in type 2.
* Key word : contigent valuation method, existence value, preservation value of wildbirds, WTP.

키워드

야생동물,   복지변화,   크낙새,   모델을 이용한 존재가치 평가,   추정치의 적합성,   두 모델의 비교