The United States Foreign Policy toward North Korea

소개글

The United States Foreign Policy toward North Korea에 대한 보고서 자료입니다.

목차

1.INTRODUCTION 3

2. MAIN BODY 4
A.NEO-CONSERVATISM AND REALISM IN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION 4
B.FOREIGN FOLICIES OF THE TWO ADMINISTRAIONS TOWARD NORTH KOREA 6
C.RESULTS OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION’S OPPRESSIVE POLICY TOWARD NOTH KOREA 8
D.OBAMA’S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD NORTH KOREA 12
E.OBAMA AND LEE ADMINISTRATION’S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD NORTH KROEA 14
E.NORTH KOREAN RESPONSES 17
F.SUGGESTIONS TO SOUTH KOREAN GOVERNMENT 18

3.CONCLUSION 18

본문내용

1. INTRODUCTION
The Bush administration has been conflicted with two ideologies, neo-conservatism and realism, concerning the policy toward North Korea. These two schools of thought on foreign policies have given important criterion to decide direction and means of North Korean foreign policies. The first administration of G.W. Bush was influenced by neo-conservatism, but realism gave a greater impact to the second Bush administration than neo-conservatism.
The two different foreign policies which based on the two different schools of thought on foreign policies have shown different results. Therefore, analyzing Bush administrations foreign policies toward North Korea has important meanings to the new President, Barack Obama’s administration. The first Bush administration’s oppressive policy toward North Korea confronted criticism because it led North Korea to use brinkmanship and increased tense between U.S.-DPRK relations. However, the second Bush administration’s change to engagement trend in North Korean foreign policy enabled ‘2•13 North Korea Nuclear Agreement’ and North Korean agree on abandoning nuclear weapons.
Even though second Bush administration’s engagement foreign policy toward North Korea brought advanced relations between the United States and North Korea, I still have questions: Can we say that the first administration’s foreign policy toward North Korea failed and second administration’s foreign policy was successful?; If North Korea thinks that they succeeded in foreign policy with brinkmanship, would they use another brinkmanship in future?; What can be the next North Korean bargaining chip?; and How should the United States react to that? I think that these questions should be considered in the Obama administration when it decides the foreign policy toward North Korea.

키워드

US policy,   North Korea,   neoconservatism,   realim,   미국 정책,   북한