|
States react to that? I think that these questions should be considered in the Obama administration when it decides the foreign policy toward North Korea. 1.INTRODUCTION 3
2. MAIN BODY 4
A.NEO-CONSERVATISM AND REALISM IN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION 4
B.FOREIGN FOLICIES OF THE TWO ADMINISTRAIO
|
|
|
of North Carolina Press.
Duncan MacRae, Jr. 1986. "Democratic Information System," in W. N. Dunn (ed.), Policy Analysis: Perspectives, Concepts, and Methods, Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 131-163.
Gross, Bertram M. 1966. "The State of the Nation: Social System Accounting," Chapter 3 in Raymond
|
|
|
of the Automatic Scientists", pp 40-45 참조
* The Report of the Commision to Assess the Ballistic Missle Treat to the United States, the U.S Congress, July 15, 1998
* William J. Perry, "Review of United States Policy Toward North Korea; UNCLASSIFIED REPORTNORTH KOREA POLICY REVIEW, October 12, 1999
|
|
|
I. Policy of Unification of South and North Korea
Both Korean unification policies are based on their constitutions. The South Korean constitution includes the concept that South Korea is the only legal state on the Korea peninsula. On the other hand, although there is no article concerning Nor
|
|
|
of a North Korean collapse, examine the legal and institutional factors of state succession as they apply to the two Koreas, assess the relevance of similar historical cases of state succession, and analyze relevant aspects of United States policy toward North and South Korea and those of the South
|
|
 |
ABSTRACT
One potential scenario regarding the future of North Korea is state collapse and unification with South Korea. Effectively isolated from the international community and the world economy, bereft of the great power patronage that it once enjoyed from the Soviet Union and China, and endurin
|
|
메뉴펼치기
