노인주택의 현황과 공급제도의 개선방안 ( 노인복지 노인문제 )

목차

I. 서 론
Ⅱ. 우리 나라 노인주거관련제도의 현황과 특성
Ⅲ. 노인주택의 개념과 국내의 현황
Ⅳ. 선진국의 노인주택 공급제도
Ⅴ. 노인주택공급제도의 개선방안
참 고 문 헌

본문내용

서 노인주택의 공급주체도 공공부문에서부터 민간까지 다양화되어야 하며, 입주방식도 임대형에서 연금지급형 등 여러 방안을 고려해야 할 것이다.
참 고 문 헌
김태현(1981). 한국에 있어서의 노인부양에 관한 연구, 고려대학교 박사학위논문.
김태현·이인수(1999). 실버산업의 미래, 미래인력연구센터.
대한주택공사(1999. 7). 노인주택 공급제도 개선 및 주공의 참여방안.
___________(1996. 9). 노인거주자를 위한 주택형 및 설계지침연구.
大韓住宅公社譯(1995. 11). 世界의 高齡者住宅.
보건복지부(1999). 1999년도 노인복지 국고보조사업 안내.
보건복지부 내부자료(1998). 유료노인복지시설현황.
尙炯種(1998). "수요 및 공급 측면에서 본 유료노인복지시설의 접근방향", 建築, 42(2).
李佳玉 외(1994). 「老人生活實態 分析 및 政策課題」, 韓國保健社會硏究院.
鄭京姬 외(1998). 「1998年度 全國 老人生活實態 및 福祉慾求調査」, 國保健社會硏究院.
鄭万鎔(1991. 8). "高齡化 社會에 對備한 日本과 美國의 住宅擔保年金制度", 주택금융, 134.
한국노인문제연구소(1975). 「한국노인의 생활실태 및 의식조사」.
Hancock, Ruth(1998). "Housing wealth, income, and financial of older perople in Britain" Ageing and Society 18. 5-33.
Kahn, A. J. & Kamermann, S. B.(1976). Social Services in International Perspectives, DHEW.
Townsend, Peter(1964). the Last refuge, Routledge.
Valins, Martin(1991). Housing for the Elderly People: A Guide for Archtecture and Clients.
butterwroth-Heinemann Ltd.
日本建築センタ(1991). 「Housing for the
Elderly in europe Today 1990:ヨロッパの高齡者住宅最新事情」東京: 日本建築センタ.
日本建築センタ(1991). 「Housing for the Elderly in Europe Today 1992:ヨロッパの高齡者住宅最新事情その2」東京 : 日本建築センタ.
高齡化と住宅を考える會(1987). 「高齡化社會の住宅」, 一紛社.
大坂讓治·三浦文夫(1993). 「高齡化社會と社會福祉」, 中央法規.
社會保障硏究院 編(1990). 「住宅政策と社會保障」, 東京大學出版會.
兒玉·田園(1993). 「 說高齡者白書1993」, 全國社會福祉協議會.
野村 歡·高山忠雄(1993). 「高齡者の住環境」, 第一法規.
園田眞理子(1993). 「世界の高齡者住宅:日本·アメリカ ·ヨロッパ」日本建築センタ.
松 永明(1999. 3). "リバスモゲジ制度の問題點と解決方法について" 「住宅」, 18-22面.
岡田直美(1999. 3). "ビアジ制度の導入と證券化の提案-持ち家を活用してゆとりある老後を過ごしために"「住宅」, 37-40面.
韓國老年學
Journal of the Korea Gerontological Society
1999. Vol. 19, No. 2, 129∼146.
The Problems of Housing for the Elderly in Korea
and its Desirable Direction
Shin young Park·Joo Jin Kim·Eun Hee Choi
Housing Research Institute Korea National Housing Corporation
The purpose of this study is to suggest the problems of housing for the elderly and to suggest its desirable direction. Specially designed housing, which typically includes a variety of supportive services, can help the aging compensate for their declining physical mobility and can specifically redress the health problems associated with advanced age. But in Korea we have not yet developed this type of housing for the elderly. What is worse, Koreans do not distinguish between "nursing homes" and "housing for the aged in general".
Therefore, it is first necessary to legally define the housing for the elderly. The second step is to authorize official support for its construction. Building a positive social environment is also important. This could include providing a subsidy for welfare of low income aged. For the purpose of constructing housing for the elderly in Korea, it will be necessary to provide loan guarantees and tax incentive programs. To form an alliance between housing and social service professionals is very important. Such an alliance would be based on several significant trends that affect the needs of the elderly and their ability to access community-based supportive services.

키워드

노인주거,   노인복지,   노인주택공급제도