RME 이론과 실제

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. RME의 기본원리

Ⅲ. 개발연구를 통한 RME 교수설계

Ⅳ. RME 이론에 따르는 미분방정식 교수설계의 예시

Ⅴ. 결론

참 고 문 헌

본문내용

한계를 RME의 이론을 적용함으로써 해결할 수 있다는 가설 하에 RME이론에 따르는 미분방정식의 교수설계의 한 예시를 제시하였다. 이 글은 현재 본교의 미분방정식 수업을 통한 교수실험연구의 일부이다. 대학수학, 특히 미분방정식에서 RME이론의 적용가능성을 제시하고자 하는 개발연구로서 미분방정식 학습에서 학생들의 사고과정과 사고방법의 기초를 세우고 정련시키기 위한 교육과정과 교수설계의 아이디어를 제공하고자 한다. 이 개발연구는 대학수학교육뿐만 아니라 중등수학교육에서 RME적용이 가능하리라는 시사점을 준다.y
참 고 문 헌
Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting experiments in collaboration with teacher. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. The Falmer Press.
Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structure. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Freudenthal, H.(1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994a). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrect: CD-β Press.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994b). Educational development and developmental research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(5), 443-471.
Gravemeijer, K. (1997). Instructional design for reform in mathematics education. In M. Beishuizen, K. Gravemeijer, & E. van Lieshout (Eds.), The role of contexts and models in the development of mathematical strategies and procedures (pp. 13-34). Utrect: CD-β Press..
Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J., & Whitenack, J. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional Design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communication in mathematics classrooms (pp. 225-273). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hubbard, J. H., McDill, J. M., Noonburg, A., & West, B.H. (1994). A new look at the Airy equation with fences and funnels. The College Mathematics Journal, 25(5), 419-431
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the American Mathematical society, 47(6), 641-649.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145.
Steffe, L., Thomson, P., & von Glasersfeld, E. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tall, D. et al. (2000). What is the object of the encapsulation of a process? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 223-241.
Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimendions. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics education: The wiskobas project. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Yackel, E. & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.

키워드

RME,   수학교육,   미분방정식