- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
본 자료는 10페이지 의 미리보기를 제공합니다. 이미지를 클릭하여 주세요.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
-
80
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
-
99
-
100
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
-
119
-
120
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
-
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
-
157
-
158
-
159
-
160
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
-
165
-
166
-
167
-
168
-
169
-
170
-
171
-
172
-
173
목차
국 문 초 록
I. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 교육에 대한 국가규제의 개념과 분석틀
1. 규제의 개념
2. 사회제도에 대한 국가규제 변화
3. 교육제도에 대한 국가규제 변화
4. 분석의 틀
Ⅲ. 고등교육에 대한 국가규제 변화의 배경
1. 교육 외적 배경요인
1) 경제구조의 변화
2) 정치구조의 변화
2. 교육 내적 배경요인
1) 교육적 관점의 변화
2) 교육적 조직의 변화
3) 교육적 집단의 변화
Ⅳ. 한국 고등교육에 대한 국가규제 변화의 과정
1. 규제정책의 변화
1) 4년제 대학에 대한 규제정책의 변화
2) 비전통적 고등교육제도의 발전과 이원적 규제정책
3) 제도 밖 고등교육에 대한 규제정책
2. 법적 규제의 변화
1) 4년제 대학에 대한 법적 규제
2) 비전통적 고등교육제도에 대한 법적 규제
3) 제도 밖 고등교육에 대한 법적 규제
Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
1. 요 약
2. 논의 및 결론
I. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 교육에 대한 국가규제의 개념과 분석틀
1. 규제의 개념
2. 사회제도에 대한 국가규제 변화
3. 교육제도에 대한 국가규제 변화
4. 분석의 틀
Ⅲ. 고등교육에 대한 국가규제 변화의 배경
1. 교육 외적 배경요인
1) 경제구조의 변화
2) 정치구조의 변화
2. 교육 내적 배경요인
1) 교육적 관점의 변화
2) 교육적 조직의 변화
3) 교육적 집단의 변화
Ⅳ. 한국 고등교육에 대한 국가규제 변화의 과정
1. 규제정책의 변화
1) 4년제 대학에 대한 규제정책의 변화
2) 비전통적 고등교육제도의 발전과 이원적 규제정책
3) 제도 밖 고등교육에 대한 규제정책
2. 법적 규제의 변화
1) 4년제 대학에 대한 법적 규제
2) 비전통적 고등교육제도에 대한 법적 규제
3) 제도 밖 고등교육에 대한 법적 규제
Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
1. 요 약
2. 논의 및 결론
본문내용
jor Advisor: Kim, Shinil, Ph.D.
This study intends to analyse the change of the state regulation on higher education in Korea. For the purpose of this study, the researcher reviewed literature related to this study and analysed education laws, ordinances and government regulations.
The researcher observed a continuous trend that the regulative policies on higher education have been changed since 1945. In particular, this study reveals that the process of the regulation change can be divided into six stages. In the period from the late 1980s to the present, the degree of the state regulation on higher education has been seriously weakened. Especially, since 1995, many new policies have been adapted to weaken the regulative power of the state on higher education system, including the moderation in the conditions of new institution establishment, the self-regulation in the management of higher education institutions. What follows is the summary of this study.
First, in the deregulation process, the state-monopolized "linear regulative system" has been diversified into various multi-channels in control, and new forms of regulation and new regulative relations have been developed.
Second, the phenomenon of deregulation has reflected many political and economic changes: that is, democratization, decentralization, and the emergence of the realm of civil society in political struture; the globalization and informationalization in economic structure, etc.
A few educational forces have also been proved to give significant influence on the phenomenon of deregulation, including newly emerging learner-centered perspectives, demands for autonomy in higher education institutions, and criticism on the inefficiency of administrative regulation to control diversified higher education system.
Third, a unique feature observed in this change is that this deregulation of higher education has been initiated by the state herself. Therefore the state has maintained her regulative power on higher education through the indirect ways, e.g. the university accreditation system, the administrative and financial support system for the management of higher education institutions. Despite the change of regulation, the learners themselves have not still participated in the process of regulation.
Based on these findings, this study projects that the tendency of deregulation will be further processed up to the level in which learner's demands and rights on education are more seriously considered. Because their active participation and involvement in the regulative process are more important in the context of lifelong education and post-industrial mode of education. Henceforth, the decision powers among the state, education institutions, teachers and learners in higher education should be more co-operatively balanced.
key words: higher education system, non- traditional universities,
regulation, deregulation of state,
education provider-centered system, learner-centered system.
This study intends to analyse the change of the state regulation on higher education in Korea. For the purpose of this study, the researcher reviewed literature related to this study and analysed education laws, ordinances and government regulations.
The researcher observed a continuous trend that the regulative policies on higher education have been changed since 1945. In particular, this study reveals that the process of the regulation change can be divided into six stages. In the period from the late 1980s to the present, the degree of the state regulation on higher education has been seriously weakened. Especially, since 1995, many new policies have been adapted to weaken the regulative power of the state on higher education system, including the moderation in the conditions of new institution establishment, the self-regulation in the management of higher education institutions. What follows is the summary of this study.
First, in the deregulation process, the state-monopolized "linear regulative system" has been diversified into various multi-channels in control, and new forms of regulation and new regulative relations have been developed.
Second, the phenomenon of deregulation has reflected many political and economic changes: that is, democratization, decentralization, and the emergence of the realm of civil society in political struture; the globalization and informationalization in economic structure, etc.
A few educational forces have also been proved to give significant influence on the phenomenon of deregulation, including newly emerging learner-centered perspectives, demands for autonomy in higher education institutions, and criticism on the inefficiency of administrative regulation to control diversified higher education system.
Third, a unique feature observed in this change is that this deregulation of higher education has been initiated by the state herself. Therefore the state has maintained her regulative power on higher education through the indirect ways, e.g. the university accreditation system, the administrative and financial support system for the management of higher education institutions. Despite the change of regulation, the learners themselves have not still participated in the process of regulation.
Based on these findings, this study projects that the tendency of deregulation will be further processed up to the level in which learner's demands and rights on education are more seriously considered. Because their active participation and involvement in the regulative process are more important in the context of lifelong education and post-industrial mode of education. Henceforth, the decision powers among the state, education institutions, teachers and learners in higher education should be more co-operatively balanced.
key words: higher education system, non- traditional universities,
regulation, deregulation of state,
education provider-centered system, learner-centered system.
추천자료
- [고등학교교육][고등학생]고등학교 음주예방지도(음주예방교육), 고등학교 진로지도(진로교육...
- [고등학교교육]고등학교의 목표, 고등학교의 학업설계, 고등학교의 선택중심교육과정, 고등학...
- 고등학교교육과정의 특징, 고등학교교육과정의 목표, 고등학교교육과정의 개정 내용, 고등학...
- 제7차교육과정 국민공통기본교육과정의 교과, 제7차교육과정 국민공통기본교육과정의 재량활...
- [제7차교육과정 이론][제7차교육과정 국민공통기본교육과정][제7차교육과정 고등학교선택중심...
- 실업계고등학교교육과정의 성격과 방향, 실업계고등학교교육과정의 변천 과정, 실업계고등학...
- [제7차교육과정][국민공통기본교육과정][고등학교선택중심교육과정]제7차교육과정의 편성, 제...
- [제7차교육과정][제7차교육과정 국민공통기본교육과정][제7차교육과정 고등학교선택중심교육...
- 제7차교육과정의 이론(기본방향, 개정특징, 인간상, 구성방침), 제7차교육과정의 국민공통기...
- [프랑스교육]프랑스교육의 특징, 프랑스교육의 체계, 프랑스교육과정의 성격, 프랑스교육과정...
- [뉴질랜드][뉴질랜드의 고등교육][뉴질랜드의 특수교육][뉴질랜드의 평생교육][뉴질랜드의 의...
- [중국의 교육][중국교육][중국교육정책]중국의 교육체제, 중국의 교육기관, 중국의 교육단계,...
- 교육정책의 정의, 교육정책의 특징, 고등교육정책(대학교육정책)의 북한고등교육, 고등교육정...
- ★ 아동간호학- 발달장애(자폐증) 아동에 대한 교육 및 진로 ( 자폐의 개념 및 증상, 자폐증 ...