고등교육의 국가규제 변화에 관한 연구
닫기
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
해당 자료는 10페이지 까지만 미리보기를 제공합니다.
10페이지 이후부터 다운로드 후 확인할 수 있습니다.

목차

국 문 초 록
I. 문제 제기

Ⅱ. 교육에 대한 국가규제의 개념과 분석틀
1. 규제의 개념
2. 사회제도에 대한 국가규제 변화
3. 교육제도에 대한 국가규제 변화
4. 분석의 틀

Ⅲ. 고등교육에 대한 국가규제 변화의 배경
1. 교육 외적 배경요인
1) 경제구조의 변화
2) 정치구조의 변화
2. 교육 내적 배경요인
1) 교육적 관점의 변화
2) 교육적 조직의 변화
3) 교육적 집단의 변화

Ⅳ. 한국 고등교육에 대한 국가규제 변화의 과정
1. 규제정책의 변화
1) 4년제 대학에 대한 규제정책의 변화
2) 비전통적 고등교육제도의 발전과 이원적 규제정책
3) 제도 밖 고등교육에 대한 규제정책
2. 법적 규제의 변화
1) 4년제 대학에 대한 법적 규제
2) 비전통적 고등교육제도에 대한 법적 규제
3) 제도 밖 고등교육에 대한 법적 규제

Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
1. 요 약
2. 논의 및 결론

본문내용

jor Advisor: Kim, Shinil, Ph.D.
This study intends to analyse the change of the state regulation on higher education in Korea. For the purpose of this study, the researcher reviewed literature related to this study and analysed education laws, ordinances and government regulations.
The researcher observed a continuous trend that the regulative policies on higher education have been changed since 1945. In particular, this study reveals that the process of the regulation change can be divided into six stages. In the period from the late 1980s to the present, the degree of the state regulation on higher education has been seriously weakened. Especially, since 1995, many new policies have been adapted to weaken the regulative power of the state on higher education system, including the moderation in the conditions of new institution establishment, the self-regulation in the management of higher education institutions. What follows is the summary of this study.
First, in the deregulation process, the state-monopolized "linear regulative system" has been diversified into various multi-channels in control, and new forms of regulation and new regulative relations have been developed.
Second, the phenomenon of deregulation has reflected many political and economic changes: that is, democratization, decentralization, and the emergence of the realm of civil society in political struture; the globalization and informationalization in economic structure, etc.
A few educational forces have also been proved to give significant influence on the phenomenon of deregulation, including newly emerging learner-centered perspectives, demands for autonomy in higher education institutions, and criticism on the inefficiency of administrative regulation to control diversified higher education system.
Third, a unique feature observed in this change is that this deregulation of higher education has been initiated by the state herself. Therefore the state has maintained her regulative power on higher education through the indirect ways, e.g. the university accreditation system, the administrative and financial support system for the management of higher education institutions. Despite the change of regulation, the learners themselves have not still participated in the process of regulation.
Based on these findings, this study projects that the tendency of deregulation will be further processed up to the level in which learner's demands and rights on education are more seriously considered. Because their active participation and involvement in the regulative process are more important in the context of lifelong education and post-industrial mode of education. Henceforth, the decision powers among the state, education institutions, teachers and learners in higher education should be more co-operatively balanced.
key words: higher education system, non- traditional universities,
regulation, deregulation of state,
education provider-centered system, learner-centered system.

추천자료

  • 가격3,300
  • 페이지수173페이지
  • 등록일2001.07.22
  • 저작시기2001.07
  • 파일형식한글(hwp)
  • 자료번호#190099
본 자료는 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원이 없습니다.
청소해
다운로드 장바구니