목차
1.문장의 재분석 과정에 관한 이론들
실험1
방법 및 절차
실험2
종합논의
실험1
방법 및 절차
실험2
종합논의
본문내용
사 '은/는'이 포함된 관계절 문장의 이해 과정. 한국 심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 10, 119-133.
남기심, 고영근 (2000). 표준국어문법론. 서울: 탑출판사.
Hirose, Y., and Inoue, A. (1998). Ambiguity of reanalysis in parsing complex sentences in Japanese. Syntax and Semantics(vol,31). New York: Academic press.
Hirose, Y., and Chun, S. A. (1998). Attachment ambiguity in head final language. Japanese and Korean Linguistics(vol, 31). New York: Academic press.
Kim, Y. J. (1999). The effects of case marking information on Korean sentence processing. Language and cognitive processes, 14, 687-714.
Kim, Y. J. (2000). Resolving grammatical marking ambiguities of Korean: An eye-tracking study. Unpublished paper.
Frazier, L., and Clifton, C. (1995). Sentence reanalysis and visibility. In F. Ferreira and J. D. Fodor(Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
Mazuka, R., and Itoh, K. (1995). Can Japanese speakers be led down the garden path?. In R. Mazuka and N. Nagai(Eds.), Japanese sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
McRae, K,. and Tannenhaus, M. K. (1999). Modeling the influence of thematic fit(and other constrains) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of memory and language, 38, 283-312.
Sturt, P., and Crocker. M. (1996). Syntactic reanalysis in human language processing. Doctoral dissertation. University of Edinburgh.
Sturt, P., and Crocker. M. (1999). Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. Journal of memory and language, 40, 136-150.
Suh, S. (1994). The syntax of Korean and its implications for parsing theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland.
Yamasita, H. (1994). Processing of Japanese and Korean, Doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University.
남기심, 고영근 (2000). 표준국어문법론. 서울: 탑출판사.
Hirose, Y., and Inoue, A. (1998). Ambiguity of reanalysis in parsing complex sentences in Japanese. Syntax and Semantics(vol,31). New York: Academic press.
Hirose, Y., and Chun, S. A. (1998). Attachment ambiguity in head final language. Japanese and Korean Linguistics(vol, 31). New York: Academic press.
Kim, Y. J. (1999). The effects of case marking information on Korean sentence processing. Language and cognitive processes, 14, 687-714.
Kim, Y. J. (2000). Resolving grammatical marking ambiguities of Korean: An eye-tracking study. Unpublished paper.
Frazier, L., and Clifton, C. (1995). Sentence reanalysis and visibility. In F. Ferreira and J. D. Fodor(Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
Mazuka, R., and Itoh, K. (1995). Can Japanese speakers be led down the garden path?. In R. Mazuka and N. Nagai(Eds.), Japanese sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
McRae, K,. and Tannenhaus, M. K. (1999). Modeling the influence of thematic fit(and other constrains) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of memory and language, 38, 283-312.
Sturt, P., and Crocker. M. (1996). Syntactic reanalysis in human language processing. Doctoral dissertation. University of Edinburgh.
Sturt, P., and Crocker. M. (1999). Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. Journal of memory and language, 40, 136-150.
Suh, S. (1994). The syntax of Korean and its implications for parsing theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland.
Yamasita, H. (1994). Processing of Japanese and Korean, Doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University.
키워드
추천자료
- 전광용 님의 꺼삐딴 리
- 학교문법의 방향 및 교육방법 제시
- 한국어 형태론 정리 자료
- 한국어의 시제
- 「외래어+する」「외래어+하다」의 대응관계에 대한 공통점과 차이점
- 우리말의 접속문에 대한 분석
- [국어] 형태소, 단어, 어절 (한국어문법3)-강의,발표용
- 한국어 부정법
- 중국어와 한국어 발음상 유사점
- [외국어로서의한국어능력평가론] Q. 언어 평가 도구의 유형 가운데 하나의 유형을 골라 문항...
- 2016년 2학기 언어의이해 중간시험과제물 E형(번역의 관점에서 영어와 한국어의 특성)
- [외국어로서의언어교수이론]제2언어 교수에서의 문화교육이라는 관점에서 최근 한국의 젊은사...