목차
I. 신공공관리론 : 행정학의 새로운 경향?
1. 신공공관리론의 이론적 기초:
2. 신공공관리론의 행정개혁 전략:
3. 비판:
II. 신거버넌스론(New Governance) : 전통적 행정학에 대한 또 하나의 대안
1. 신거버넌스론의 이론적 기초
2. 신거버넌스론의 행정개혁전략
III. 김대중 정부의 행정개혁
IV. 결론
참고문헌
1. 신공공관리론의 이론적 기초:
2. 신공공관리론의 행정개혁 전략:
3. 비판:
II. 신거버넌스론(New Governance) : 전통적 행정학에 대한 또 하나의 대안
1. 신거버넌스론의 이론적 기초
2. 신거버넌스론의 행정개혁전략
III. 김대중 정부의 행정개혁
IV. 결론
참고문헌
본문내용
: Making Government Work 1945-1995. New
London, CT: Yale University Press.
Lynn, Jr., L. (1998). "The New Public Management: How to Translate a Theme into a
Legacy." Public Administration Review. 58(3): 231-238.
McGregor, E. (1984). The Great Paradox of Democratic Citizenship and Public Personnel
Administration. Public Administration Review. 44(special issue): 126-150.
Maor, M. (1999). "The Paradox of Managerialism" Public Administration Review. 59(1):
5-22
Mascarenhaus, R. (1993). Building an Enterprise Culture in the Public Sector in
Australia, Britain, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review. 53:319-328.
Ministry of Finance and Economy. (1999). Djnomics: A New Foundation for the
Korean Economy. Seoul: KDI.
Moe, T. (1990). The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public
Bureaucracy. In O. Williamson (ed.). Organization Theory. New York: Oxford
University Press.
OECD. (1993). Public Management Developments Survey. Paris: OECD.
Ostrom, V. (1989). Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Peters, G. (1996). The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence, KS:
University Press of Kansas.
Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American
Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
_______. (1993). Occasional Excursions: A Brief History of Policy Evaluation in the UK.
Parliamentary Affairs. 46(3): 353-362.
Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexity
and Accountability. Bristrol, PA: Open University Press.
Rouban, L. (ed). (1999). Citizens and the New Governance. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Rosenau, J. (1992). Citizenship in a Changing Global Order. In J. Rosnau and E-O Czempiel (eds). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World
Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saint-Martin, D. (1998). "Management Consultants, the State, and the Politics of
Administrative Reform in Britain and Canada". Administration and Society. 30(5):
533-569.
Schachter, H. (1995). "Reinventing Government or Reinventing Ourselves: Two Models
for Improving Government Performance." Public Administration Review. 55(6):
530-537.
Schick, A.(1998). "Why Most Developing Countries Should Not try New Zealand's
Reform". The World Bank Research Observer. 13(1): 123-131.
Simon, H.(1998). "Why Public Administration?" Public Administration Review. 1998(1):ii.
Sjolom, .(1999). "Transparency and Citizen Participation". in Rouban, L. (ed). (1999).
Citizens and the New Governance. Amsterdam: IOS Press: 15-27.
Terry, L (1998). "Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the New Public
Management". Public Administration Review. 58(3): 194-200.
_______. (1999). "From Greek Mythology to the Real World of the New Public
Management and Democratic Governance". Public Administration Review. 59(3):
272-.
Thompson, J. and P. Ingraham. (1996). "The Reinvention Game." Public Administration
Review. 56(3): 291-298.
London, CT: Yale University Press.
Lynn, Jr., L. (1998). "The New Public Management: How to Translate a Theme into a
Legacy." Public Administration Review. 58(3): 231-238.
McGregor, E. (1984). The Great Paradox of Democratic Citizenship and Public Personnel
Administration. Public Administration Review. 44(special issue): 126-150.
Maor, M. (1999). "The Paradox of Managerialism" Public Administration Review. 59(1):
5-22
Mascarenhaus, R. (1993). Building an Enterprise Culture in the Public Sector in
Australia, Britain, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review. 53:319-328.
Ministry of Finance and Economy. (1999). Djnomics: A New Foundation for the
Korean Economy. Seoul: KDI.
Moe, T. (1990). The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public
Bureaucracy. In O. Williamson (ed.). Organization Theory. New York: Oxford
University Press.
OECD. (1993). Public Management Developments Survey. Paris: OECD.
Ostrom, V. (1989). Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Peters, G. (1996). The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence, KS:
University Press of Kansas.
Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American
Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
_______. (1993). Occasional Excursions: A Brief History of Policy Evaluation in the UK.
Parliamentary Affairs. 46(3): 353-362.
Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexity
and Accountability. Bristrol, PA: Open University Press.
Rouban, L. (ed). (1999). Citizens and the New Governance. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Rosenau, J. (1992). Citizenship in a Changing Global Order. In J. Rosnau and E-O Czempiel (eds). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World
Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saint-Martin, D. (1998). "Management Consultants, the State, and the Politics of
Administrative Reform in Britain and Canada". Administration and Society. 30(5):
533-569.
Schachter, H. (1995). "Reinventing Government or Reinventing Ourselves: Two Models
for Improving Government Performance." Public Administration Review. 55(6):
530-537.
Schick, A.(1998). "Why Most Developing Countries Should Not try New Zealand's
Reform". The World Bank Research Observer. 13(1): 123-131.
Simon, H.(1998). "Why Public Administration?" Public Administration Review. 1998(1):ii.
Sjolom, .(1999). "Transparency and Citizen Participation". in Rouban, L. (ed). (1999).
Citizens and the New Governance. Amsterdam: IOS Press: 15-27.
Terry, L (1998). "Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the New Public
Management". Public Administration Review. 58(3): 194-200.
_______. (1999). "From Greek Mythology to the Real World of the New Public
Management and Democratic Governance". Public Administration Review. 59(3):
272-.
Thompson, J. and P. Ingraham. (1996). "The Reinvention Game." Public Administration
Review. 56(3): 291-298.
추천자료
- 미․일 신 방위협력지침에 대한 중국의 외교안보정책 대응에 관한 연구
- 행정 이념
- 현대사회와 행정(작은정부론)
- 성과관리와 BSC(Balenced Score Card)
- 재무행정론 기금에 관한 연구
- [경영이론][조직이론][테일러][페욜][베버][스코트][허즈버그]경영이론, 조직이론(테일러의 ...
- [거버넌스][거버넌스 특성][거버넌스 모형][구성주의적 해석][거버넌스 적용 사례]거버넌스의...
- 새로운 행정관리
- 행정이론의 변천) 고전적, 행정국가시대, 신자유주의시대의 행정이론
- 행정학의 주요이론
- 행정학개론 최종본
- 현대행정이론에관한연구업
- 현대 행정의 기능
- 대한무역투자진흥공사의 목표 관리 현황과 개선방안(BSC성과관리)