 |
formative evaluation』,ASTC, 1991
Timothy Ambrose and Crispin Paine, 「Evaluating exhibitions」,『Museum Basics』, ICOM, 1993
김주연, 「박물관 전시평가 도구에 관한 연구」, 『디자인논문집 제4호』, 1998 1. 머리말
2. 전시평가의 필요성과 평가환경 분석
1) 전
|
|
|
adaus(Eds.), Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning (pp. 561-641). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook Ⅱ: The affective domain. New York: David Mckay.
Simpson, B. J.(1966). The classifi
|
|
|
evaluation of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a pilot study. J. Manipulative Physiol Ther, 13(1): 6-13.
Wikinson, H(1981). The Impect of Sursery of Truma on Body Image. Inter.
William, P.C(1937). "Lessons of the Lumbosacral spine.Ⅱ: Chronic traumatic(postural
|
|
|
Evaluation
대상 아동이 낙상하지 않았음.
보호자가 낙상예방 교육을 받은 후 교육내용을 이행하는 모습이 9/11개 관찰되었음.
- 환아는 아직 낙상 고위험군(환아의 연령)이므로 낙상위험에 대한 주의가 필요함을 설명함. Ⅰ. 문헌고찰
Ⅱ. Hist
|
|
|
assessment, which has been used in many subjects. It is an effective method to assess the student’s results and process their performances systematically. However, there exists a problem which has been raised steadily. It takes a long time for students to make a proper portfolio. In addition to this
|
|
|
evaluation of selected bilingual education projects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
④ 웹 자료의 경우
저자명(위와 같음), 발행년도(괄호 속에 표시), 웹 자료(사이트)의 제목, 검색 날짜, 웹사이트 주소
<예7> Degelman, D., & Harris, M. L. (200
|
|
|
evaluation; 3) improving self confidence over speech anxiety through a presenter's role; 4) successful experiences of problem solving through the group activity; 5) positive verbal feedback such as a praise and encouragement from colleagues and professor. Ⅰ. 서 론
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
|
|
|
evaluation-differential therapy for stuttering children. In Stuttering and related disorders of fluency (2nd ed.). NY: Thieme.
Runyan, C. M. & Runyan, S. E.(1999). Therapy for school-age Stutters: An Update of the fluency rules program. In Stuttering and related disorders of fluency (2nd ed.). NY:
|
|
|
professionalism as a teacher through feedback and evaluation; 3) improving self confidence over speech anxiety through a presenter's role; 4) successful experiences of problem solving through the group activity; 5) positive verbal feedback such as a praise and encouragement from colleagues and profe
|
|
메뉴펼치기
