목차
1. KEY CHARACTERISTICS
2. PROBLEMS
3. THINKING FURTHER
4. ANSWERS
2. PROBLEMS
3. THINKING FURTHER
4. ANSWERS
본문내용
Side-effect of high level Autonomy
: lack of feed-back from managers and
certain role assignment certain role assignment
Caused Group-thinking
Weaken communication skills Weaken communication skills
Team characteristics
Team Problems
THINKING FURTHER THINKING FURTHER “Is there something else they should know?”
“Not all the conflicts are bad.” Many researchers are distributing organizational conflict into two subcategories ; Relationship Conflict vs Task Conflict. Evidence has shown that moderate level of task conflict can act as a facilitator for good performance of a team*. - Task conflict improves qualities of group decision-making; reduces the chances of groupthink. ☞Some group dynamics intentionally form task conflict (i.e. dialetic inquiry, devil’s advocacy) inquiry, devil’s advocacy)
inquiry, devil’s advocacy)
Pelled’s demographic segmentation diagram
Generally, there are four common types of teams
: problem-solving/ self-managed/cross-functional/virtual
In this case, Comparing self-managed team with problem-solving team,
adver. team seems to have sort of self-managed team characteristics.
self-managed team
is created to solve problem, Implement
solution, and Take responsibility for outcomes
has strong authority and
supervisory importance decrease
strongly use internal decision-making
process
: lack of feed-back from managers and
certain role assignment certain role assignment
Caused Group-thinking
Weaken communication skills Weaken communication skills
Team characteristics
Team Problems
THINKING FURTHER THINKING FURTHER “Is there something else they should know?”
“Not all the conflicts are bad.” Many researchers are distributing organizational conflict into two subcategories ; Relationship Conflict vs Task Conflict. Evidence has shown that moderate level of task conflict can act as a facilitator for good performance of a team*. - Task conflict improves qualities of group decision-making; reduces the chances of groupthink. ☞Some group dynamics intentionally form task conflict (i.e. dialetic inquiry, devil’s advocacy) inquiry, devil’s advocacy)
inquiry, devil’s advocacy)
Pelled’s demographic segmentation diagram
Generally, there are four common types of teams
: problem-solving/ self-managed/cross-functional/virtual
In this case, Comparing self-managed team with problem-solving team,
adver. team seems to have sort of self-managed team characteristics.
self-managed team
is created to solve problem, Implement
solution, and Take responsibility for outcomes
has strong authority and
supervisory importance decrease
strongly use internal decision-making
process
키워드
추천자료
- [조직행동론] 감정과 스트레스
- [조직행동론] 시험대비 진짜완벽 요약자료입니다.
- [조직행동론] 시험대비 완벽 요약자료!!
- [조직행동론] 지각(Perception), 귀인(Attribution), 학습(Learning)
- [조직행동] 서번트리더십.ppt
- [조직행동론] 가치관변화
- Take-home exam_인간행동과조직
- [조직행동론] 리더십 사례분석 L-Shipment (현대 정몽구, 대우 김우중).ppt
- [조직행동론] 목표설정과 보상을 통한 동기부여 (칭찬은 고래도 춤추게 한다.).ppt
- [조직행동론] 의사소통사례
- [조직행동론] 의사소통 사례
- [조직행동론] 구성원 의식조사(EOS) 케이스 스터디 Case Study - 제2금융권 A사 EOS(Employee...
- ★ 조직행동론 - 테드강연 감상보고서
- [조직행동론] 한올제약의 성과향상을 위한 효과적인 동기부여 전략
소개글