목차
Ⅰ. 연구목적
Ⅱ. 청소년범죄의 원인과 대처
1. 청소년범죄의 주요 원인
2. 청소년범죄의 원인별 대처
Ⅲ. 청소년범죄 예방을 위한 종합적 대처 : 기존의 주요 논의들
Ⅳ. 청소년범죄 예방을 위한 지역중심의 종합적 다기관 연계전략 모색
1. 관련 기관과 역할
2. 종합적 연계방안의 운영에 있어서 지역단위
3. 종합적 연계방안에 있어서 운영 주체
4. 지역중심의 종합적 다기관 연계방안
Ⅴ. 맺음말
Ⅱ. 청소년범죄의 원인과 대처
1. 청소년범죄의 주요 원인
2. 청소년범죄의 원인별 대처
Ⅲ. 청소년범죄 예방을 위한 종합적 대처 : 기존의 주요 논의들
Ⅳ. 청소년범죄 예방을 위한 지역중심의 종합적 다기관 연계전략 모색
1. 관련 기관과 역할
2. 종합적 연계방안의 운영에 있어서 지역단위
3. 종합적 연계방안에 있어서 운영 주체
4. 지역중심의 종합적 다기관 연계방안
Ⅴ. 맺음말
본문내용
at-risk Children and Youth. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 13:1-25.
Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and Decline. New York: Free Press.
Smith, C. A. and S.B. Stern. (1997). Delinquency and Antisocial Behavior: A Review of Family Processes and Intervention Research. Social Service Review 71:382-420.
Spergel, I. A. (1995). The Youth Gang Problem: A Community Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spergel, I. A., and S.F. Grossman. (1997). The Little Vilage Project: A Community Approach to the Gang Problem. Social Work 42:456-470.
Taylor, R. B. (1996). Neighborhood Responses to Disorder and Local Attachments: the Systemic Model of Attachment, Social Disorganization, and Neighborhood Use Value. Social Forces 11:41-74.
Thurman, Q.C., A.L. Giacomazzi, M.D. Reisig, and D.G. Mueller. (1996). Community-based Gang Prevention and Intervention. Crime and Delinquency 42:279-95.
Tierney, J.P., J.B. Grossman, and N.L. Resch. (1995). Making a Difference: An Impact Study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Tolan, P.H., and N.G. Guerra. (1994). What Works in Reducing Adolescent Violence: An Empirical Review of the Field. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, University of Colorado.
Tremblay, R.E., F. Vitaro, L. Bertrand, M. Le Blanc, H. Beauchesne, H. Boileau, and H. David. (1992). Parent and Child Training to Prevent Early Onset of Delinquency: The Montreal Longtitudinal -Experimental Study. In J. McCord and R. E. Tremblay(Eds.), Preventing Antisocial Behavior: Interventions from Birth through Adolescence. New York: Guilford.
Walsh, M.E., M.M. Brabeck, and K.A. Howard. (1999). Interprofessional Collaboration in Children's Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice 2:183-208.
Weissberg, R.P., and M.T. Greenberg. (1997). School and Community Competence-Enhancement and Prevention Programs. In I.E. Sigel and K.A. Renninger(Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Child Psychology in practice(5th ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Wilson, J.Q. and G. Kelling. (1982). Broken Windows. Athlantic Monthly 211:29-38.
ABSTRACT
Community-based comprehensive multi-agency approach for
juvenile crime prevention
Lee, Seong Sik*
This study emphasizes a comprehensive strategy to reduce crime risk factors in individual, family, school, peer group, and community levels. This effort includes prevention, early intervetion, and treatment services for juvenile offenders. This study offers a coordinated, community-based multi-agency network system both to provide several simultaneous services for youths and to reduce disorganized neighborhood environments. This stuy suggests a role of each agency such as family, school, welfare center, police, probation officials, church, business, and residents in a community-based comprehensive multi-agency collaboration. This study emphasizes the engagement of neighborhood residents as a main role in comprehensive multi-agency activities.
주제어: 청소년범죄, 다기관 연계, 종합적 방안
Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and Decline. New York: Free Press.
Smith, C. A. and S.B. Stern. (1997). Delinquency and Antisocial Behavior: A Review of Family Processes and Intervention Research. Social Service Review 71:382-420.
Spergel, I. A. (1995). The Youth Gang Problem: A Community Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spergel, I. A., and S.F. Grossman. (1997). The Little Vilage Project: A Community Approach to the Gang Problem. Social Work 42:456-470.
Taylor, R. B. (1996). Neighborhood Responses to Disorder and Local Attachments: the Systemic Model of Attachment, Social Disorganization, and Neighborhood Use Value. Social Forces 11:41-74.
Thurman, Q.C., A.L. Giacomazzi, M.D. Reisig, and D.G. Mueller. (1996). Community-based Gang Prevention and Intervention. Crime and Delinquency 42:279-95.
Tierney, J.P., J.B. Grossman, and N.L. Resch. (1995). Making a Difference: An Impact Study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Tolan, P.H., and N.G. Guerra. (1994). What Works in Reducing Adolescent Violence: An Empirical Review of the Field. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, University of Colorado.
Tremblay, R.E., F. Vitaro, L. Bertrand, M. Le Blanc, H. Beauchesne, H. Boileau, and H. David. (1992). Parent and Child Training to Prevent Early Onset of Delinquency: The Montreal Longtitudinal -Experimental Study. In J. McCord and R. E. Tremblay(Eds.), Preventing Antisocial Behavior: Interventions from Birth through Adolescence. New York: Guilford.
Walsh, M.E., M.M. Brabeck, and K.A. Howard. (1999). Interprofessional Collaboration in Children's Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice 2:183-208.
Weissberg, R.P., and M.T. Greenberg. (1997). School and Community Competence-Enhancement and Prevention Programs. In I.E. Sigel and K.A. Renninger(Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Child Psychology in practice(5th ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Wilson, J.Q. and G. Kelling. (1982). Broken Windows. Athlantic Monthly 211:29-38.
ABSTRACT
Community-based comprehensive multi-agency approach for
juvenile crime prevention
Lee, Seong Sik*
This study emphasizes a comprehensive strategy to reduce crime risk factors in individual, family, school, peer group, and community levels. This effort includes prevention, early intervetion, and treatment services for juvenile offenders. This study offers a coordinated, community-based multi-agency network system both to provide several simultaneous services for youths and to reduce disorganized neighborhood environments. This stuy suggests a role of each agency such as family, school, welfare center, police, probation officials, church, business, and residents in a community-based comprehensive multi-agency collaboration. This study emphasizes the engagement of neighborhood residents as a main role in comprehensive multi-agency activities.
주제어: 청소년범죄, 다기관 연계, 종합적 방안
추천자료
- 청소년문제와 자신의 해결방안 (청소년 폭력및 범죄에 중점)
- 청소년 범죄의 원인과 대책
- 청소년 이하를 대상으로 한 재범 성범죄자 전자 팔찌 착용 의무화와 신상공개 [토론리포트]
- 청소년의 정의와 범죄에 대한 실태 및 개선방향
- [청소년문제 대책, 청소년문제] 청소년문제의 원인과 책임 및 청소년문제의 실태와 대책방안 ...
- [사회학][스포츠 사회학][범죄 사회학][비행 사회학][청소년폭력 사회학][돈의 사회학]사회학...
- [비행과 범죄] 비행청소년과 범죄인의 특성 및 이해
- 청소년 사이버 일탈) 청소년의 컴퓨터 중독과 사이버 범죄 및 일탈행동
- [범죄심리학] 청소년 비행의 이론 유형과 특성 및 원인에 대한 정리와 분석 -사상체질의학의 ...
- [청소년 비행문화] 소년범죄의 개념(정의)과 특징, 이론, 처우 강화 및 정책방안 개선, 청소...
- [돈크라이마미 영화분석] 영화 돈 크라이 마미 (Don't Cry Mommy)가 주는 시사점과 미성년자 ...
- 청소년 문제 행동의 접근방법을 생물학적 이론, 가족체계 이론, 사회학적 이론과 심리학적 ...
- [청소년상담] 청소년의 비행 및 일탈(관련 사례포함) - 청소년 비행의 개념과 특징, 청소년 ...
- 청소년과 성,청소년복지론,청소년기 성 의식,청소년기 성문제,스마트폰 앱을 이용한 성범죄