목차
1. 서론
2. 본론
2.1. 모니터 모델(Monitor Model)
2.1.1. 모니터 모델의 다섯 가지 가설
2.1.2. Non-Interface와 Interface의 입장
2.1.3. 자연적 접근법(Natural Approach)
2.2. 유표성차이 가설(Markedness Differential Hypothesis: MDH)
2.3. 경합 모델(The Competition Model)
2.4. 기능주의 모델(Functionalist Model)
3. 결론
2. 본론
2.1. 모니터 모델(Monitor Model)
2.1.1. 모니터 모델의 다섯 가지 가설
2.1.2. Non-Interface와 Interface의 입장
2.1.3. 자연적 접근법(Natural Approach)
2.2. 유표성차이 가설(Markedness Differential Hypothesis: MDH)
2.3. 경합 모델(The Competition Model)
2.4. 기능주의 모델(Functionalist Model)
3. 결론
본문내용
nd Language Acquisition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
______________(1985). The markedness differential hypothesis theory and applications, In Wheatley, B., Hastings, A., Eckman, F., Bell, L., Krukar, G. and Rutkowski, R.(eds.), Current Approaches to Second Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 1984 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguisitcs Club.
Givon, T.(1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
______________(1984). Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
______________(1985). Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Iconicity in Syntax, Haiman, John (ed.).
______________(1993). Coherence in text, coherence in mind. Pragmatics & Cognition 1-2.
Gregg, K.(1984). Krashen's Monitor and Occam's razor, Applied Linguistics 5, pp.79-100.
Huebner, T.(1983). A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English, Ann Arbor, ML:Karoma.
Krashen, S.(1976). Formal and informal linguistic envionments in language acquisition and language learning, Tesol Qualterly 19, pp/157-168.
______________(1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning, Oxford: Pergamon.
______________(1982). Principles and practive in second language acquisition, Oxford: Perfamon.
______________(1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications, New York: Longman.
Krashen, S. and Scarcella, R.(1978). On routines and patterns in language acquisition and performance, Language Learning 28: pp.283-300.
Krashen, S. and Terrell, T.(1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom, Oxford: Perfamon.
Larsen-Freeman, D.(1975). The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students, TESOL Qualterly 9: pp.409-430.
McLaughlim, B.(1978). The monitor model: some methodological consideration, Language Learning 28: pp.309-332.
______________(1987). Theories of Second-Language Learning, London:Arnold.
Sasaki, Y.(1991). English and Japanese Interlanguage comprehension strategies: An analysis based on the competition model. Applied Psycholinguisitcs 12, pp.47-72.
______________(1994). Paths of processing strategy transfers in learning Japanese and English as foreign languages, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, pp.43-72.
______________(1997a). Individual Variation in a Japanese Sentence Comprehension Task: Form, Functions, and Strategies, Applied Linguistics 18, pp.508-537.
______________(1997b). Material and Presentation Condition Effects on Sentence Interpretation Task Performance: Methodological Examinations of the Competition Experiment, Second Language Research 13, pp.66-91.
Sato, C.(1988). Orgins of complex syntax in interlanguage development, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, pp.371-395.
Swain, M.(1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development, In Gass, S. and Madden, C.(eds.). (1985). Input in Second Language Acquisition, Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
______________(1985). The markedness differential hypothesis theory and applications, In Wheatley, B., Hastings, A., Eckman, F., Bell, L., Krukar, G. and Rutkowski, R.(eds.), Current Approaches to Second Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 1984 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguisitcs Club.
Givon, T.(1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
______________(1984). Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
______________(1985). Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Iconicity in Syntax, Haiman, John (ed.).
______________(1993). Coherence in text, coherence in mind. Pragmatics & Cognition 1-2.
Gregg, K.(1984). Krashen's Monitor and Occam's razor, Applied Linguistics 5, pp.79-100.
Huebner, T.(1983). A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English, Ann Arbor, ML:Karoma.
Krashen, S.(1976). Formal and informal linguistic envionments in language acquisition and language learning, Tesol Qualterly 19, pp/157-168.
______________(1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning, Oxford: Pergamon.
______________(1982). Principles and practive in second language acquisition, Oxford: Perfamon.
______________(1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications, New York: Longman.
Krashen, S. and Scarcella, R.(1978). On routines and patterns in language acquisition and performance, Language Learning 28: pp.283-300.
Krashen, S. and Terrell, T.(1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom, Oxford: Perfamon.
Larsen-Freeman, D.(1975). The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students, TESOL Qualterly 9: pp.409-430.
McLaughlim, B.(1978). The monitor model: some methodological consideration, Language Learning 28: pp.309-332.
______________(1987). Theories of Second-Language Learning, London:Arnold.
Sasaki, Y.(1991). English and Japanese Interlanguage comprehension strategies: An analysis based on the competition model. Applied Psycholinguisitcs 12, pp.47-72.
______________(1994). Paths of processing strategy transfers in learning Japanese and English as foreign languages, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, pp.43-72.
______________(1997a). Individual Variation in a Japanese Sentence Comprehension Task: Form, Functions, and Strategies, Applied Linguistics 18, pp.508-537.
______________(1997b). Material and Presentation Condition Effects on Sentence Interpretation Task Performance: Methodological Examinations of the Competition Experiment, Second Language Research 13, pp.66-91.
Sato, C.(1988). Orgins of complex syntax in interlanguage development, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, pp.371-395.
Swain, M.(1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development, In Gass, S. and Madden, C.(eds.). (1985). Input in Second Language Acquisition, Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
추천자료
- 구성주의 학습 이론-로저스 확산이론,조직개발이론,볼라의 CLER 모델
- 인지행동모델의 등장배경, 인지이론 및 행동주의 이론 분석과 인지행동모델 분석[A+ 평가 레...
- 언어발달이론 중에서 본인이 찬성하는 입장의 이론을 선택하고, 선택한 근거를 설명하시오.
- 발달이론에서, Pavlov와 Skinnerd 행동주의 학습이론, Bandurad 사회학습이론, Lorenz 동물생...
- 영유아 언어발달 이론을 종류별로 설명하고 각 이론을 바탕으로 앞으로 추구해야 할 영유아 ...
- 아동의 언어발달 - 언어의 정의 및 언어발달의 이론, 언어발달의 과정과 언어발달에 관련된 요인
- <과제중심모델>의 개요 및 이론적 배경, 과제중심모델의 주요개념 및 문제해결과정, 과제중심...
- 인지행동모델 [인지행동모델 철학, 인지행동모델 기본개념, 인지행동모델 이론적기반, 인지행...
- 인지행동모델 [인지행동모델 철학, 인지행동모델 기본개념, 인지행동모델 이론적기반, 인지행...
- 사회복지실천론_ 행동수정 모델의 개요와 이론적 배경 및 실천과정, 행동수정 모델의 종결단...
- [유아교육] 언어 발달 이론과 아동 언어의 기능 및 사회성 발달과 언어 발달, 혼합 연령 집단...
- 총체적 언어 접근법 : 언어지도 이론 중 총체적 언어 접근법을 설명하시오
- 영유아 언어발달 이론을 종류별로 설명하고 각 이론을 바탕으로 앞으로 추구해야 할 영유아 ...
- 가족치료모델의 초기모델과 후기모델(다세대모델, 경험적 모델, 구조적 모델, 전략적 모델, ...
소개글